These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19633351)

  • 21. The impact of strong assimilation on the perception of connected speech.
    Gaskell MG; Snoeren ND
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1632-47. PubMed ID: 19045997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
    Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intelligibility, listening difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms.
    Prodi N; Visentin C; Farnetani A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 20649212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech.
    Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Female voice communications in high level aircraft cockpit noises--part II: vocoder and automatic speech recognition systems.
    Nixon C; Anderson T; Morris L; McCavitt A; McKinley R; Yeager D; McDaniel M
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1087-94. PubMed ID: 9819167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of attention load on the use of statistical information and coarticulation as speech segmentation cues.
    Fernandes T; Kolinsky R; Ventura P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1522-32. PubMed ID: 20675798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues.
    Fraser S; Gagné JP; Alepins M; Dubois P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 19635945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of speaking rate on the identification of word boundaries.
    Schwab S; Miller JL; Grosjean F; Mondini M
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 18679044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition.
    Dilley LC; Pitt MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2340-53. PubMed ID: 17902869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries.
    Mattys SL; Melhorn JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):554-67. PubMed ID: 17614511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of tonal movement and vowel quality on intelligibility in singing.
    Andreas T
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16517520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dysarthric speech: a comparison of computerized speech recognition and listener intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Leeper HA; Kotler AL; Thomas-Stonell N; O'Neill C; Dylke MC; Rolls K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Jul; 34(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 9239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phonetically trained and untrained adults' transcription of place of articulation for intervocalic lingual stops with intermediate acoustic cues.
    Mayo C; Gibbon F; Clark RA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 23275392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues.
    Gilbert G; Bergeras I; Voillery D; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1336. PubMed ID: 17927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure.
    Jaeggi SM; Buschkuehl M; Perrig WJ; Meier B
    Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 20408039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.