These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19633373)

  • 1. From a black-box to a glass-box system: the attempt towards a plant-wide automation concept for full-scale biogas plants.
    Wiese J; König R
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 19633373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Operational results of an agricultural biogas plant equipped with modern instrumentation and automation.
    Wiese J; Kujawski O
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 18413937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of instrumentation systems as a base for control of digestion process stability in full-scale agricultural and industrial biogas plants.
    Kujawski O; Steinmetz H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19844052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Instrumentation, control and automation for full-scale manure-based biogas systems.
    Wiese J; Haeck M
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(9):1-8. PubMed ID: 17163036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new analytical approach to optimizing the design of large-scale composting systems.
    Bongochgetsakul N; Ishida T
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Apr; 99(6):1630-41. PubMed ID: 17532629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detailed monitoring of two biogas plants and mechanical solid-liquid separation of fermentation residues.
    Bauer A; Mayr H; Hopfner-Sixt K; Amon T
    J Biotechnol; 2009 Jun; 142(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19480948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production.
    Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2537-41. PubMed ID: 19254824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy use and recovery strategies within wastewater treatment and sludge handling at pulp and paper mills.
    Stoica A; Sandberg M; Holby O
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jul; 100(14):3497-505. PubMed ID: 19307113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbiological removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas by means of a separate biofilter system: experience with technical operation.
    Schieder D; Quicker P; Schneider R; Winter H; Prechtl S; Faulstich M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 14531443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Progress on biogas technology and engineering].
    Liu X; Yuan Y; Yan Z
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2010 Jul; 26(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 20954393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anammox brings WWTP closer to energy autarky due to increased biogas production and reduced aeration energy for N-removal.
    Siegrist H; Salzgeber D; Eugster J; Joss A
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 18309216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method to determine the ratio of electricity production from fossil and biogenic sources in waste-to-Energy plants.
    Fellner J; Cencic O; Rechberger H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2579-86. PubMed ID: 17438819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of flyash and biogas slurry for improving wheat yield and physical properties of soil.
    Garg RN; Pathak H; Das DK; Tomar RK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Aug; 107(1-3):1-9. PubMed ID: 16418901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Energy potential of anaerobic digestion of solid wastes generated in the Russian Federation.
    Kalyuzhnyi SV
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(9):1743-8. PubMed ID: 19029714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methane production from kitchen waste using Escherichia coli.
    Jayalakshmi S; Joseph K; Sukumaran V
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Apr; 49(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 18476402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operational characteristics of a 1.2-MW biomass gasification and power generation plant.
    Wu CZ; Yin XL; Ma LL; Zhou ZQ; Chen HP
    Biotechnol Adv; 2009; 27(5):588-92. PubMed ID: 19397988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Will waste-energy plant be a waste of money?
    Bazan G
    Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7218):30. PubMed ID: 18987718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential errors in the quantitative evaluation of biogas production in anaerobic digestion processes.
    Walker M; Zhang Y; Heaven S; Banks C
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(24):6339-46. PubMed ID: 19660937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biogas as a resource-efficient vehicle fuel.
    Börjesson P; Mattiasson B
    Trends Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18036686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level in Sweden: scale, choice of substrate and utilisation rate most important parameters for financial feasibility.
    Svensson LM; Christensson K; Björnsson L
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2006 Jul; 29(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 16770592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.