These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1059 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19633397)

  • 1. Climate change impacts on activated sludge wastewater treatment: a case study from Norway.
    Plósz BG; Liltved H; Ratnaweera H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 19633397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sewage-treatment under substantial load variations in winter tourism areas--a full case study.
    Winkler S; Matsché N; Gamperer T; Dum M
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):147-55. PubMed ID: 15553470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Savings with upgraded performance through improved activated sludge denitrification in the combined activated sludge-biofilter system of the Southpest Wastewater Treatment Plant.
    Jobbágy A; Tardy GM; Palkó G; Benáková A; Krhutková O; Wanner J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(8):1287-93. PubMed ID: 18469403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linked models to assess the impacts of climate change on nitrogen in a Norwegian river basin and FJORD system.
    Kaste Ø; Wright RF; Barkved LJ; Bjerkeng B; Engen-Skaugen T; Magnusson J; Saelthun NR
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 365(1-3):200-22. PubMed ID: 16580049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimisation of a large WWTP thanks to mathematical modelling.
    Printemps C; Baudin A; Dormoy T; Zug M; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):113-22. PubMed ID: 15553466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of heat recovery from raw wastewater on nitrification and nitrogen removal in activated sludge plants.
    Wanner O; Panagiotidis V; Clavadetscher P; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4725-34. PubMed ID: 16278004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced nitrogen removal in the combined activated sludge-biofilter system of the Southpest Wastewater Treatment Plant.
    Jobbágy A; Tardy GM; Literáthy B
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):1-8. PubMed ID: 15553452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RTC simulations on large branched sewer systems with SmaRTControl.
    de Korte K; van Beest D; van der Plaat M; de Graaf E; Schaart N
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 19633390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamics in maximal settling capacity in an activated sludge treatment plant with highly loaded secondary settlers.
    Wilén BM; Lumley D; Nordqvist A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):187-94. PubMed ID: 15553475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid activated sludge/biofilm process for the treatment of municipal wastewater in a cold climate region: a case study.
    Di Trapani D; Christensso M; Odegaard H
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 21436546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diurnal variations in the occurrence and the fate of hormones and antibiotics in activated sludge wastewater treatment in Oslo, Norway.
    Plósz BG; Leknes H; Liltved H; Thomas KV
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Mar; 408(8):1915-24. PubMed ID: 20156636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of primary sedimentation on full-scale WWTP nutrient removal performance.
    Puig S; van Loosdrecht MC; Flameling AG; Colprim J; Meijer SC
    Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3375-84. PubMed ID: 20430413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The solids retention time-a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants.
    Clara M; Kreuzinger N; Strenn B; Gans O; Kroiss H
    Water Res; 2005 Jan; 39(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 15607169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance intensification of Prague wastewater treatment plant.
    Novák L; Havrlíková D
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):139-46. PubMed ID: 15553469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant.
    Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic control strategy for step feed anoxic/aerobic biological nitrogen removal process.
    Zhu GB; Peng YZ; Wu SY; Wang SY
    J Environ Sci (China); 2005; 17(3):457-9. PubMed ID: 16083124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Full-scale experiences of nitrogen removal of fish-processing wastewater with flotation and anoxic-aerobic activated sludge system.
    Steinke M; Barjenbruch M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2227-33. PubMed ID: 20418618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Climate-change impacts on hydrology and nutrients in a Danish lowland river basin.
    Andersen HE; Kronvang B; Larsen SE; Hoffmann CC; Jensen TS; Rasmussen EK
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 365(1-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 16647104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and analysis of a solar reactor for anaerobic wastewater treatment.
    Yiannopoulos ACh; Manariotis ID; Chrysikopoulos CV
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Nov; 99(16):7742-9. PubMed ID: 18328695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.