330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19633893)
1. Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures?
Jayaraman S; Quan D; Al-Ghamdi I; El-Deen F; Schlachta CM
Surg Endosc; 2010 Mar; 24(3):584-8. PubMed ID: 19633893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy.
Ruurda JP; van Dongen KW; Dries J; Borel Rinkes IH; Broeders IA
Surg Endosc; 2003 Dec; 17(12):1937-42. PubMed ID: 14569457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience.
Jayaraman S; Davies W; Schlachta CM
Can J Surg; 2009 Oct; 52(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 19865571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic vascular anastomoses: does robotic (Zeus-Aesop) assistance help to overcome the learning curve?
Nio D; Bemelman WA; Balm R; Legemate DA
Surg Endosc; 2005 Aug; 19(8):1071-6. PubMed ID: 16021377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In experienced hands, does the robotic platform impact operative efficiency? Comparison of the da Vinci Si versus Xi robot in colorectal surgery.
Hill A; McCormick J
J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):789-792. PubMed ID: 32100165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it?
Hubens G; Balliu L; Ruppert M; Gypen B; Van Tu T; Vaneerdeweg W
Surg Endosc; 2008 Jul; 22(7):1690-6. PubMed ID: 18071805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems.
Sung GT; Gill IS
Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):893-8. PubMed ID: 11744453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are there advantages to robotic-assisted surgery over laparoscopy from the surgeon's perspective?
Van Koughnett JA; Jayaraman S; Eagleson R; Quan D; van Wynsberghe A; Schlachta CM
J Robot Surg; 2009 Jun; 3(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 27638219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical assessment of porcine enteroenterostomy performed with ZEUS robotic technology.
Hollands CM; Dixey LN; Torma MJ
J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1231-3. PubMed ID: 11479863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study.
Margossian H; Garcia-Ruiz A; Falcone T; Goldberg JM; Attaran M; Miller JH; Gagner M
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1998 Apr; 8(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 9617965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid adaptation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
Park SS; Kim MC; Park MS; Hyung WJ
Surg Endosc; 2012 Jan; 26(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 21789643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study.
Lorincz A; Knight CG; Kant AJ; Langenburg SE; Rabah R; Gidell K; Dawe E; Klein MD; McLorie G
J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Feb; 40(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 15750940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is feasible with no operative conversions during the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon developing a robotics program.
Blumberg D
J Robot Surg; 2019 Aug; 13(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 30474786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
Amodeo A; Linares Quevedo A; Joseph JV; Belgrano E; Patel HR
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Jun; 61(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19451894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Senhance surgical system in benign hysterectomy: A real-world comparative assessment of case times and instrument costs versus da Vinci robotics and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy procedures.
Coussons H; Feldstein J; McCarus S
Int J Med Robot; 2021 Aug; 17(4):e2261. PubMed ID: 33860631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system.
Hernandez JD; Bann SD; Munz Y; Moorthy K; Datta V; Martin S; Dosis A; Bello F; Darzi A; Rockall T
Surg Endosc; 2004 Mar; 18(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 14752634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Anastomosis: Shorter than the Laparoscopic Technique? An Educational Study.
Lucereau B; Thaveau F; Lejay A; Roussin M; Georg Y; Heim F; Lee JT; Chakfe N
Ann Vasc Surg; 2016 May; 33():39-44. PubMed ID: 26806248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis.
Ruurda JP; Broeders IA
Surg Endosc; 2003 Feb; 17(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12399841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
