191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19634024)
1. Bolus compared with continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent using real-time contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound in breast tumors.
Saracco A; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Themudo R; Wilczek B; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):854-9. PubMed ID: 19634024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using real-time contrast harmonic imaging in invasive breast cancer: comparison of enhancement dynamics with three different doses of contrast agent.
Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Tánczos E; Wilczek B; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 24445092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast tumors using kinetic features of real-time harmonic contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Wilczek B; Celebioglu F; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 22434928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bolus versus continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent for liver ultrasound by using an automatic power injector in humans: A pilot study.
Quaia E; Gennari AG; Angileri R; Cova MA
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016; 44(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 26302446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.
Zhao H; Xu R; Ouyang Q; Chen L; Dong B; Huihua Y
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):288-93. PubMed ID: 19559551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast enhanced harmonic ultrasound for differentiating breast tumors - first results.
Jung EM; Jungius KP; Rupp N; Gallegos M; Ritter G; Lenhart M; Clevert DA; Kubale R
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2005; 33(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 16151258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: assessment of diagnostic accuracy.
Nemec U; Nemec SF; Novotny C; Weber M; Czerny C; Krestan CR
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1357-65. PubMed ID: 22322310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).
Greis C
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2011; 49(1-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 22214685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography in rat: infusion versus bolus administration.
Su HL; Qian YQ; Wei ZR; He JG; Li GQ; Zhang J; Zhou XD; Jing W
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):748-55. PubMed ID: 19410132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses?
Sorelli PG; Cosgrove DO; Svensson WE; Zaman N; Satchithananda K; Barrett NK; Lim AK
J Clin Ultrasound; 2010 May; 38(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 20146214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical significance of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor.
Wenhua D; Lijia L; Hui W; Wei Y; Li T
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2012 Jun; 63(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 22373958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using bolus injections of contrast agent for assessment of postprandial microvascular blood volume in human skeletal muscle.
Mertz KH; Bülow J; Holm L
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Sep; 38(5):864-871. PubMed ID: 29282853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus color duplex ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Iezzi R; Basilico R; Giancristofaro D; Pascali D; Cotroneo AR; Storto ML
J Vasc Surg; 2009 Mar; 49(3):552-60. PubMed ID: 19135839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microbubble contrast agent for color Doppler US: effect on breast masses. Work in progress.
Kedar RP; Cosgrove D; McCready VR; Bamber JC; Carter ER
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):679-86. PubMed ID: 8628854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound features of hepatocellular adenoma and the additional value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Dong Y; Zhu Z; Wang WP; Mao F; Ji ZB
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2016 Feb; 15(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 26818543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of transducers with different frequencies in breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using SonoVue as contrast agent.
Wang YM; Fan W; Zhang K; Zhang L; Tan Z; Ma R
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20151050. PubMed ID: 27143439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ultrasonography contrast media Levovist and power Doppler in the study of the breast. Methodology, vascular morphology and automatic enhancement quantification with wash-in and wash-out curves].
Menna S; Di Virgilio MR; Burke P
Radiol Med; 1999 Jun; 97(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 10478204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can different regions of interest influence the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced sonography?
Li J; Guo L; Yin L; Fang H; Ye W; Zhao B; Liu Y; Xu T
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():1-6. PubMed ID: 30396640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves.
Gauthier TP; Chebil M; Peronneau P; Lassau N
Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 21722933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhanced ablation of high intensity focused ultrasound with microbubbles: an experimental study on rabbit hepatic VX2 tumors.
He W; Wang W; Zhou P; Wang YX; Zhou P; Li RZ; Wang JS; Ahuja AT
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Oct; 34(5):1050-7. PubMed ID: 21127863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
