176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19634311)
1. Modulation-based digital noise reduction for application to hearing protectors to reduce noise and maintain intelligibility.
Chung K; Tufts J; Nelson L
Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 19634311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective compression and noise reduction configurations for hearing protectors.
Chung K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1090-101. PubMed ID: 17348531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting.
Ellis GM; Crukley J; Souza PE
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):760-774. PubMed ID: 38254265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding speech when wearing communication headsets and hearing protectors with subband processing.
Brammer AJ; Yu G; Bernstein ER; Cherniack MG; Peterson DR; Tufts JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):671-81. PubMed ID: 25096102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: experts' opinions and naive normal-hearing listeners' performance.
Hilkhuysen GL; Gaubitch N; Huckvale M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):404-15. PubMed ID: 23090965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.
Gustafson S; McCreery R; Hoover B; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz P
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 24473240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Digital Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids on Speech Intelligibility in Both Quiet and Noisy Environments.
Deniz B; Gülmez ZD; Kara H; Kara E
Noise Health; 2024 Apr-Jun 01; 26(121):220-225. PubMed ID: 38904826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.
Mueller HG; Weber J; Hornsby BW
Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 16959732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech intelligibility in difficult signal/noise circumstances.
Kiukaanniemi H; Sorri M
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 30():215-8. PubMed ID: 3227274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital noise reduction hearing aids in adults.
Lakshmi MSK; Rout A; O'Donoghue CR
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Feb; 16(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 31502900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceived sound quality of different signal processing algorithms by cochlear implant listeners in real-world acoustic environments.
Chung K
J Commun Disord; 2020; 83():105973. PubMed ID: 31901876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of noise reduction on AM and FM perception.
Ives DT; Calcus A; Kalluri S; Strelcyk O; Sheft S; Lorenzi C
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 14(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 23180229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
