These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19635239)

  • 1. A systematic review of the quality and impact of anxiety disorder meta-analyses.
    Ipser JC; Stein DJ
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2009 Aug; 11(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 19635239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.
    Olthuis JV; Watt MC; Bailey K; Hayden JA; Stewart SH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD011565. PubMed ID: 25742186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.
    Olthuis JV; Watt MC; Bailey K; Hayden JA; Stewart SH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3(3):CD011565. PubMed ID: 26968204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)].
    Walther S; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1106-10. PubMed ID: 22144064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
    Ioannidis JP
    Milbank Q; 2016 Sep; 94(3):485-514. PubMed ID: 27620683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interventions for adults with a history of complex traumatic events: the INCiTE mixed-methods systematic review.
    Melton H; Meader N; Dale H; Wright K; Jones-Diette J; Temple M; Shah I; Lovell K; McMillan D; Churchill R; Barbui C; Gilbody S; Coventry P
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Sep; 24(43):1-312. PubMed ID: 32924926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized Trials, Meta-Analyses, and Systematic Reviews: Using Examples from Rheumatology.
    Pope JE; Hazlewood GS
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2018 May; 44(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 29622296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses: basic criteria in the world of scientific evidence].
    Purgato M; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    Riv Psichiatr; 2012; 47(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22358214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
    Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of systematic reviews to justify orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional analysis.
    Johnson AL; Walters C; Gray H; Torgerson T; Checketts JX; Boose M; Norris B; Vassar M
    Injury; 2020 Feb; 51(2):212-217. PubMed ID: 31711650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
    Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-help and Internet-guided interventions in depression and anxiety disorders: a systematic review of meta-analyses.
    Van't Hof E; Cuijpers P; Stein DJ
    CNS Spectr; 2009 Feb; 14(2 Suppl 3):34-40. PubMed ID: 19238128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Rushton L; Abrams KR
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2006; 41(7):1245-58. PubMed ID: 16923604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.