166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19636066)
1. The impact of cigarette package design on perceptions of risk.
Hammond D; Parkinson C
J Public Health (Oxf); 2009 Sep; 31(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 19636066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth.
Hammond D; Dockrell M; Arnott D; Lee A; McNeill A
Eur J Public Health; 2009 Dec; 19(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 19726589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improper disclosure: tobacco packaging and emission labelling regulations.
Hammond D; White CM
Public Health; 2012 Jul; 126(7):613-9. PubMed ID: 22609086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. US Smokers' Beliefs, Experiences and Perceptions of Different Cigarette Variants Before and After the FSPTCA Ban on Misleading Descriptors Such as "Light," "Mild," or "Low".
Yong HH; Borland R; Cummings KM; Lindblom EN; Li L; Bansal-Travers M; O'Connor RJ; Elton-Marshall T; Thrasher JF; Hammond D; Thompson ME; Partos TR
Nicotine Tob Res; 2016 Nov; 18(11):2115-2123. PubMed ID: 27083215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scope for regulation of cigarette smoke toxicity: the case for including charcoal filters.
Laugesen M; Fowles J
N Z Med J; 2005 Apr; 118(1213):U1402. PubMed ID: 15843831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the removal of misleading terms on cigarette pack on smokers' beliefs about 'light/mild' cigarettes: cross-country comparisons.
Yong HH; Borland R; Cummings KM; Hammond D; O'Connor RJ; Hastings G; King B
Addiction; 2011 Dec; 106(12):2204-13. PubMed ID: 21658140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Taking ad-Vantage of lax advertising regulation in the USA and Canada: reassuring and distracting health-concerned smokers.
Anderson SJ; Pollay RW; Ling PM
Soc Sci Med; 2006 Oct; 63(8):1973-85. PubMed ID: 16843578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does tobacco industry marketing of 'light' cigarettes give smokers a rationale for postponing quitting?
Gilpin EA; Emery S; White MM; Pierce JP
Nicotine Tob Res; 2002; 4 Suppl 2():S147-55. PubMed ID: 12573176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stages of change and other factors in 'light' cigarette smokers.
Kelbsch J; Meyer C; Rumpf HJ; John U; Hapke U
Eur J Public Health; 2005 Apr; 15(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 15941759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond light and mild: cigarette brand descriptors and perceptions of risk in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.
Mutti S; Hammond D; Borland R; Cummings MK; O'Connor RJ; Fong GT
Addiction; 2011 Jun; 106(6):1166-75. PubMed ID: 21481054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference?
Germain D; Wakefield MA; Durkin SJ
J Adolesc Health; 2010 Apr; 46(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 20307829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can Removing Tar Information From Cigarette Packages Reduce Smokers' Misconceptions About Low-Tar Cigarettes? An Experiment From One of the World's Lowest Tar Yield Markets, South Korea.
Paek HJ; Dewhirst T; Hove T
Nicotine Tob Res; 2020 May; 22(6):990-996. PubMed ID: 30726984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Awareness of FDA-mandated cigarette packaging changes among smokers of 'light' cigarettes.
Falcone M; Bansal-Travers M; Sanborn PM; Tang KZ; Strasser AA
Health Educ Res; 2015 Feb; 30(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25492058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do smokers in Europe think all cigarettes are equally harmful?
Brown A; McNeill A; Mons U; Guignard R
Eur J Public Health; 2012 Feb; 22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22294783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.
Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Hammond D; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
Tob Control; 2012 Sep; 21(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 21998127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Smokers' sensory beliefs mediate the relation between smoking a light/low tar cigarette and perceptions of harm.
Elton-Marshall T; Fong GT; Yong HH; Borland R; Xu SS; Quah AC; Feng G; Jiang Y
Tob Control; 2015 Nov; 24 Suppl 4(0 4):iv21-7. PubMed ID: 25370698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deadly in pink: the impact of cigarette packaging among young women.
Doxey J; Hammond D
Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 21478476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship of cigarette-related perceptions to cigarette design features: findings from the 2009 ITC U.S. Survey.
O'Connor RJ; Caruso RV; Borland R; Cummings KM; Bansal-Travers M; Fix BV; King B; Hammond D; Fong GT
Nicotine Tob Res; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1943-7. PubMed ID: 23943847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of variant descriptors on the potential effectiveness of plain packaging.
Borland R; Savvas S
Tob Control; 2014 Jan; 23(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23436139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between constituent labelling and reporting of tar yields among smokers in four countries.
O'Connor RJ; Kozlowski LT; Borland R; Hammond D; McNeill A
J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Dec; 28(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 16973837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
