239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19637218)
1. Transient zeta-potential measurements in hydrophobic, TOPAS microfluidic substrates.
Tandon V; Bhagavatula SK; Kirby BJ
Electrophoresis; 2009 Aug; 30(15):2656-67. PubMed ID: 19637218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Zeta potential and electroosmotic mobility in microfluidic devices fabricated from hydrophobic polymers: 1. The origins of charge.
Tandon V; Bhagavatula SK; Nelson WC; Kirby BJ
Electrophoresis; 2008 Mar; 29(5):1092-101. PubMed ID: 18306184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for simultaneous estimation of inhomogeneous zeta potential and slip coefficient in microchannels.
Park HM; Choi YJ
Anal Chim Acta; 2008 Jun; 616(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 18482599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Zeta potential and electroosmotic mobility in microfluidic devices fabricated from hydrophobic polymers: 2. Slip and interfacial water structure.
Tandon V; Kirby BJ
Electrophoresis; 2008 Mar; 29(5):1102-14. PubMed ID: 18306185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fabrication and validation of a multi-channel type microfluidic chip for electrokinetic streaming potential devices.
Chun MS; Shim MS; Choi NW
Lab Chip; 2006 Feb; 6(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 16450042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Charge-based particle separation in microfluidic devices using combined hydrodynamic and electrokinetic effects.
Jellema LC; Mey T; Koster S; Verpoorte E
Lab Chip; 2009 Jul; 9(13):1914-25. PubMed ID: 19532967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recursive estimation of transient inhomogeneous zeta potential in microchannel turns using velocity measurements.
Park HM; Kim TW
Biomed Microdevices; 2009 Feb; 11(1):231-41. PubMed ID: 18807196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling of combined electroosmotic and capillary flow in microchannels.
Waghmare PR; Mitra SK
Anal Chim Acta; 2010 Mar; 663(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 20206000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numeric simulation of heat transfer and electrokinetic flow in an electroosmosis-based continuous flow PCR chip.
Gui L; Ren CL
Anal Chem; 2006 Sep; 78(17):6215-22. PubMed ID: 16944904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancement of electrokinetically driven microfluidic T-mixer using frequency modulated electric field and channel geometry effects.
Yan D; Yang C; Miao J; Lam Y; Huang X
Electrophoresis; 2009 Sep; 30(18):3144-52. PubMed ID: 19764063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of zeta potential of electroosmotic flow in a microchannel using a reduced-order model.
Park HM; Hong SM; Lee JS
Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Oct; 9(5):751-60. PubMed ID: 17530411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a bi-functional silica monolith for electro-osmotic pumping and DNA clean-up/extraction using gel-supported reagents in a microfluidic device.
Oakley JA; Shaw KJ; Docker PT; Dyer CE; Greenman J; Greenway GM; Haswell SJ
Lab Chip; 2009 Jun; 9(11):1596-600. PubMed ID: 19458868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ac electroosmosis in rectangular microchannels.
Campisi M; Accoto D; Dario P
J Chem Phys; 2005 Nov; 123(20):204724. PubMed ID: 16351310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling of electrokinetic transport in silica nanofluidic channels.
Wang M; Kang Q; Ben-Naim E
Anal Chim Acta; 2010 Apr; 664(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20363398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In situ particle zeta potential evaluation in electroosmotic flows from time-resolved microPIV measurements.
Sureda M; Miller A; Diez FJ
Electrophoresis; 2012 Sep; 33(17):2759-68. PubMed ID: 22965723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrokinetic flow control in microfluidic chips using a field-effect transistor.
Horiuchi K; Dutta P
Lab Chip; 2006 Jun; 6(6):714-23. PubMed ID: 16738721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ion size and image effect on electrokinetic flows.
Liu Y; Liu M; Lau WM; Yang J
Langmuir; 2008 Mar; 24(6):2884-91. PubMed ID: 18237199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of streaming potential on pulsating mass flow rate control in combined electroosmotic and pressure-driven microfluidic devices.
Chakraborty J; Ray S; Chakraborty S
Electrophoresis; 2012 Feb; 33(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 22212910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of the Navier slip coefficient of microchannels exploiting the streaming potential.
Park HM
Electrophoresis; 2012 Mar; 33(6):906-15. PubMed ID: 22528410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AC field induced-charge electroosmosis over leaky dielectric blocks embedded in a microchannel.
Zhao C; Yang C
Electrophoresis; 2011 Feb; 32(5):629-37. PubMed ID: 21290390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
