These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19637963)

  • 1. Meta-analysis and the comparative phylogenetic method.
    Lajeunesse MJ
    Am Nat; 2009 Sep; 174(3):369-81. PubMed ID: 19637963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phylogenetic meta-analysis.
    Adams DC
    Evolution; 2008 Mar; 62(3):567-72. PubMed ID: 18182073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does phylogeny matter? Assessing the impact of phylogenetic information in ecological meta-analysis.
    Chamberlain SA; Hovick SM; Dibble CJ; Rasmussen NL; Van Allen BG; Maitner BS; Ahern JR; Bell-Dereske LP; Roy CL; Meza-Lopez M; Carrillo J; Siemann E; Lajeunesse MJ; Whitney KD
    Ecol Lett; 2012 Jun; 15(6):627-36. PubMed ID: 22487445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.
    Huson DH; Bryant D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):254-67. PubMed ID: 16221896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative method for studying adaptation to a randomly evolving environment.
    Hansen TF; Pienaar J; Orzack SH
    Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):1965-77. PubMed ID: 18452574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies.
    Adams DC; Collyer ML
    Evolution; 2009 May; 63(5):1143-54. PubMed ID: 19210539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing current adaptation and phylogenetic inertia as explanations of trait evolution: the need for controlled comparisons.
    Hansen TF; Orzack SH
    Evolution; 2005 Oct; 59(10):2063-72. PubMed ID: 16405152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tempo and mode of evolutionary radiation in iguanian lizards.
    Harmon LJ; Schulte JA; Larson A; Losos JB
    Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):961-4. PubMed ID: 12920297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis.
    Swiderski DL; Zelditch ML; Fink WL
    Syst Biol; 1998 Sep; 47(3):508-19. PubMed ID: 12066691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure.
    Vamosi SM; Heard SB; Vamosi JC; Webb CO
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Feb; 18(4):572-92. PubMed ID: 19037898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of sample size and intraspecific variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta-analytic review.
    Garamszegi LZ; Møller AP
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2010 Nov; 85(4):797-805. PubMed ID: 20148861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phylogenetic targeting of research effort in evolutionary biology.
    Arnold C; Nunn CL
    Am Nat; 2010 Nov; 176(5):601-12. PubMed ID: 20887190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microsatellite behavior with range constraints: parameter estimation and improved distances for use in phylogenetic reconstruction.
    Pollock DD; Bergman A; Feldman MW; Goldstein DB
    Theor Popul Biol; 1998 Jun; 53(3):256-71. PubMed ID: 9679321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis.
    Rosenberg MS
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):464-8. PubMed ID: 15807430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test.
    Martins EP; Diniz-Filho JA; Housworth EA
    Evolution; 2002 Jan; 56(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11913655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Untangling hybrid phylogenetic signals: horizontal gene transfer and artifacts of phylogenetic reconstruction.
    Beiko RG; Ragan MA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 532():241-56. PubMed ID: 19271189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phylogenetic comparative approaches for studying niche conservatism.
    Cooper N; Jetz W; Freckleton RP
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Dec; 23(12):2529-39. PubMed ID: 20964782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased rates of molecular evolution in an equatorial plant clade: an effect of environment or phylogenetic nonindependence?
    Brown JM; Pauly GB
    Evolution; 2005 Jan; 59(1):238-42. PubMed ID: 15792244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species.
    Losos JB
    Ecol Lett; 2008 Oct; 11(10):995-1003. PubMed ID: 18673385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology.
    Garland T; Bennett AF; Rezende EL
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 16):3015-35. PubMed ID: 16081601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.