These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19638333)
1. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study. Maggioni A; Minig L; Zanagnolo V; Peiretti M; Sanguineti F; Bocciolone L; Colombo N; Landoni F; Roviglione G; Vélez JI Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Oct; 115(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 19638333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study. Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center. Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ["Learning curve" robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy]. Pilka R; Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Neubert D Ceska Gynekol; 2013 Jan; 78(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 23607379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes. Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States. Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. Luo C; Liu M; Li X BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of abdominal vs. robotic radical hysterectomies for patients with cervical cancer: a Bulgarian experience. Gorchev GA; Tomov ST; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova N; Tomova VD; Ahmad S J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):339-352. PubMed ID: 33913085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes. Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution. Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Cantrell LA; Mendivil A; Gehrig PA; Boggess JF Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 20153886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience. Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study. Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer. Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]