BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19638333)

  • 1. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study.
    Maggioni A; Minig L; Zanagnolo V; Peiretti M; Sanguineti F; Bocciolone L; Colombo N; Landoni F; Roviglione G; Vélez JI
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Oct; 115(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 19638333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
    Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ["Learning curve" robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy].
    Pilka R; Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Neubert D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2013 Jan; 78(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 23607379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of abdominal vs. robotic radical hysterectomies for patients with cervical cancer: a Bulgarian experience.
    Gorchev GA; Tomov ST; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova N; Tomova VD; Ahmad S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):339-352. PubMed ID: 33913085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
    Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience.
    Cantrell LA; Mendivil A; Gehrig PA; Boggess JF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 20153886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
    Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
    Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.