164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19638333)
21. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome.
Wallin E; Flöter Rådestad A; Falconer H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 May; 96(5):536-542. PubMed ID: 28186616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH): a case control study from EIO/Milan.
Sert MB
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):389; author reply 389-90. PubMed ID: 20153028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The institutional learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study.
Eoh KJ; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
BMC Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32093687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Minig L; Zanagnolo V; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Colombo N; Maggioni A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1372-7. PubMed ID: 27247200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.
Nezhat FR; Datta MS; Liu C; Chuang L; Zakashansky K
JSLS; 2008; 12(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 18765043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee HJ; Hong DG; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Feb; 28(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perioperative Outcomes of 3-Arm Versus 4-Arm Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Yim GW; Eoh KJ; Chung YS; Kim SW; Kim S; Nam EJ; Lee JY; Kim YT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):823-831. PubMed ID: 29287717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Sun CC; Dos Reis R; Schmeler KM; Nick AM; Westin SN; Brown J; Levenback CF; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Nov; 123(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 21872911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
