220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19638863)
1. Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle.
Pickhardt PJ; Schumacher C; Kim DH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 19638863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection.
Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Gopal DV
Gastroenterology; 2006 May; 130(6):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16697721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Registration of central paths and colonic polyps between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography: pilot study.
Li P; Napel S; Acar B; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Beaulieu CF
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2912-23. PubMed ID: 15543800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A feasibility study of unidirectional 240°-angle 3D CT colonography.
Oh SN; Lee YJ; Kim YS; Jung SE; Rha SE; Shin YR; Byun JY; Choi BG
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 22920361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography.
Li H; Pineau B; Santago P
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Mar; 18(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 15645333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uni- and bidirectional wide angle CT colonography: effect on missed areas, surface visualization, viewing time and polyp conspicuity.
East JE; Saunders BP; Boone D; Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA
Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1910-7. PubMed ID: 18414869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population].
Juchems MS; Ernst AS; Sheafor DH; Carrascosa P; Virmany S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 19440949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electronic colon-cleansing for CT colonography: diagnostic performance.
Juchems MS; Ernst A; Johnson P; Virmani S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 18343970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polyp detection at CT colonography: inadequate primary 3D endoluminal reference standard precludes meaningful comparison.
Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):316-7. PubMed ID: 17581913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.
Bethea E; Nwawka OK; Dachman AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19933648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Registration of the endoluminal surfaces of the colon derived from prone and supine CT colonography.
Roth HR; McClelland JR; Boone DJ; Modat M; Cardoso MJ; Hampshire TE; Hu M; Punwani S; Ourselin S; Slabaugh GG; Halligan S; Hawkes DJ
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3077-89. PubMed ID: 21815381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized detection of colorectal masses in CT colonography based on fuzzy merging and wall-thickening analysis.
Näppi JJ; Frimmel H; Dachman AH; Yoshida H
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):860-72. PubMed ID: 15125004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography.
Röttgen R; Fischbach F; Plotkin M; Herzog H; Freund T; Schröder RJ; Felix R
Acta Radiol; 2005 May; 46(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 15981716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography: external clinical validation of an algorithm for computer-assisted prone and supine registration.
Boone DJ; Halligan S; Roth HR; Hampshire TE; Helbren E; Slabaugh GG; McQuillan J; McClelland JR; Hu M; Punwani S; Taylor SA; Hawkes DJ
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):752-60. PubMed ID: 23687175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
