These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19639078)

  • 21. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
    Hjalmarsson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
    Kim KS; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Yang JH; Lee JB; Yim SH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21198900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
    Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.
    Park JK; Choi JU; Jeon YC; Choi KS; Jeong CM
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 20456024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
    Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of casting procedures on screw loosening in UCLA-type abutments.
    Kano SC; Binon P; Bonfante G; Curtis DA
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 16650006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of repeated screw tightening on bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface.
    do Nascimento C; Pedrazzi V; Miani PK; Moreira LD; de Albuquerque RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1394-7. PubMed ID: 19709063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of commercially pure titanium and alternative dental alloys on the marginal fit of one-piece cast implant frameworks.
    de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Dent; 2007 Oct; 35(10):800-5. PubMed ID: 17825466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque.
    Dailey B; Jordan L; Blind O; Tavernier B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 19492640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
    Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
    Haack JE; Sakaguchi RL; Sun T; Coffey JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 7590997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
    Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pre-load on oral implants after screw tightening fixed full prostheses: an in vivo study.
    Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 28(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 11350577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.