BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19640204)

  • 1. Screening for cervical cancer: which common technique is the most cost-effective choice?
    Wiwanitkit V
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(3):531-2. PubMed ID: 19640204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries.
    Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Gaffikin L; Limpahayom KK; Lumbiganon P; Warakamin S; King J; Yi B; Ringers P; Blumenthal PD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(19):1469-83. PubMed ID: 12359856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical cancer screening from Pap smear to human papillomavirus DNA testing.
    Jin XW; Xu H
    Compr Ther; 2001; 27(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 11569320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis for Pap smear screening and human papillomavirus DNA testing and vaccination.
    Chen MK; Hung HF; Duffy S; Yen AM; Chen HH
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 21679279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-specific performance of careHPV versus Papanicolaou and visual inspection of cervix with acetic acid testing in a primary cervical cancer screening.
    Labani S; Asthana S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2016 Jan; 70(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 26248549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus DNA testing and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening in a publicly financed health-care system.
    Chow IH; Tang CH; You SL; Liao CH; Chu TY; Chen CJ; Chen CA; Pwu RF
    Br J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 103(12):1773-82. PubMed ID: 21102588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Screening of cervical cancer--update].
    Dvorák V; Ondrus J
    Ceska Gynekol; 2010 Feb; 75(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 20437841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost of screening for cancerous and precancerous lesions of the cervix.
    Méréa E; Le Galès C; Cochand-Priollet B; Cartier I; de Crémoux P; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Vielh P; Coste J
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Oct; 27(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 12357505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of single-, double- and triple-combined testing, including Pap test, HPV DNA test and cervicography, as screening methods for the detection of uterine cervical cancer.
    Kim JH; Kim IW; Kim YW; Park DC; Kim YW; Lee KH; Ahn TG; Han SJ; Ahn WS
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Apr; 29(4):1645-51. PubMed ID: 23443346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of visual inspection with acetic acid and human papillomavirus testing for detection of high-grade cervical lesions in HIV positive and HIV negative Tanzanian women.
    Dartell MA; Rasch V; Iftner T; Kahesa C; Mwaiselage JD; Junge J; Gernow A; Ejlersen SF; Munk C; Kjaer SK
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Aug; 135(4):896-904. PubMed ID: 24391021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies based on the Papanicolaou smear test in Korea.
    Ko MJ; Kim J; Kim Y; Lee YJ; Hong SR; Lee JK
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2317-22. PubMed ID: 25824757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HPV for cervical cancer screening: is the era of the molecular pap smear upon us?
    Stoler MH
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2001 Sep; 49(9):1197-8. PubMed ID: 11511693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands.
    Berkhof J; Coupé VM; Bogaards JA; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
    Int J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 127(9):2147-58. PubMed ID: 20112339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cancer screening in the early post vaccine era.
    Waxman AG
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):537-48; vii. PubMed ID: 19061815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can self vaginal douching for high risk HPV screening replace or assist efficacy of cervical cancer screening?
    Suwannarurk K; Bhamarapravatana K; Kheolamai P; Thaweekul Y; Mairaing K; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(5):1397-401. PubMed ID: 21198300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Impact of Human Papillomavirus DNA Self-sampling on the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Wong EL; Chan PK; Chor JS; Cheung AW; Huang F; Wong SY
    Cancer Nurs; 2016; 39(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 25730587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human papillomavirus screening and cervical cancer prevention.
    Sasieni PD
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2000; 55(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 10935355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing for human papillomavirus in women with abnormal pap smear results.
    McCaffery KJ; Waller J; Forrest S; Wardle J
    JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1350; author reply 1351-2. PubMed ID: 12234219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of adding human papilloma virus testing to a managed care cervical cancer screening program.
    Lonky NM; Hunter MI; Sadeghi M; Edwards G; Bajamundi K; Monk BJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 17917570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.