These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19640673)

  • 1. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a monoblock tibial component.
    O'Keefe TJ; Winter S; Lewallen DG; Robertson DD; Poggie RA
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 19640673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Poultsides LA; Gasparini G
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2193-8. PubMed ID: 27172865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.
    DeFrancesco CJ; Canseco JA; Nelson CL; Israelite CL; Kamath AF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):865-870. PubMed ID: 29762282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Midterm results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component clinical and radiographic results of 108 knees.
    Unger AS; Duggan JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):855-60. PubMed ID: 21036009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years.
    Kamath AF; Lee GC; Sheth NP; Nelson CL; Garino JP; Israelite CL
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1390-5. PubMed ID: 21872424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
    Hu B; Chen Y; Zhu H; Wu H; Yan S
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):666-674. PubMed ID: 27776898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty with a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component.
    Hayakawa K; Date H; Tsujimura S; Nojiri S; Yamada H; Nakagawa K
    Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 23871406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncemented tantalum metal components versus cemented tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: 11- to 15-year outcomes of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Hampton M; Mansoor J; Getty J; Sutton PM
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug; 102-B(8):1025-1032. PubMed ID: 32731836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
    Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary results of an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.
    Helm AT; Kerin C; Ghalayini SR; McLauchlan GJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):941-4. PubMed ID: 18672343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trabecular metal tibial knee component still stable at 10 years.
    Henricson A; Nilsson KG
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Oct; 87(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 27357222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cementless total knee replacement fixation: a contemporary durable solution--affirms.
    Kwong LM; Nielsen ES; Ruiz DR; Hsu AH; Dines MD; Mellano CM
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Nov; 96-B(11 Supple A):87-92. PubMed ID: 25381416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Porous Tantalum Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Excellent 10-Year Survivorship.
    Hadley ML; Harmer JR; Wright BH; Larson DR; Abdel MP; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 38677340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Long WJ; Scuderi GR
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1086-92. PubMed ID: 18823749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones.
    You JS; Wright AR; Hasegawa I; Kobayashi B; Kawahara M; Wang J; Nakasone CK
    Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):228-239. PubMed ID: 30554910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of pegged and stemmed designs.
    Bertin KC
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Aug; 22(5):670-8. PubMed ID: 17689774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.
    Pulido L; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Stuart MJ; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 24687433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rates of osteolysis and loosening associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. Results at five to fourteen years.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 14996878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total knee arthroplasty using cementless keels and cemented tibial trays: 10-year results.
    Kolisek FR; Mont MA; Seyler TM; Marker DR; Jessup NM; Siddiqui JA; Monesmith E; Ulrich SD
    Int Orthop; 2009 Feb; 33(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 18185931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total knee arthroplasty with an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component: a registry-based analysis.
    Niemeläinen M; Skyttä ET; Remes V; Mäkelä K; Eskelinen A
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 23683519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.