These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

804 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19640873)

  • 21. On ethical peer review and publication: the importance of professional conduct and communication.
    Spear HJ
    Nurse Author Ed; 2004; 14(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 15551686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Journal lays bare remarks from peer reviewers.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):642. PubMed ID: 16467803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.
    Polak JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 7645496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What journal editors would like from reviewers.
    Alspach G
    Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Dec; 14(6):13-6. PubMed ID: 7712795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
    Bugiardini R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Double-blind peer review].
    Fenyvesi T
    Orv Hetil; 2002 Feb; 143(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 11875838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.
    Gelenberg AJ
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599. PubMed ID: 20031101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
    Snell L; Spencer J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study.
    Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):441-5. PubMed ID: 9708752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
    Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
    van Loon AJ
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.
    Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():679-88. PubMed ID: 15116658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
    Cintas P
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.