These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19641156)
1. Surfactant release from hydrophilized vinylpolysiloxanes. Balkenhol M; Haunschild S; Lochnit G; Wöstmann B J Dent Res; 2009 Jul; 88(7):668-72. PubMed ID: 19641156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Erkut S; Can G J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Kess RS; Combe EC; Sparks BS J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10898846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure. Hosseinpour D; Berg JC J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers. Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials. Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials. Al-Johani A; Clark RK; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials. Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials. Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions. Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coating of silicone-based impression materials in a glow-discharge system by acrylic acid plasma. Ozden N; Ayhan H; Erkut S; Can G; Pişkin E Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 9758971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of cross-linking agent and surfactant on the tear strength of novel vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Ud Din S; Parker S; Braden M; Patel M Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):e334-e343. PubMed ID: 30318115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials. Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection. Walker MP; Rondeau M; Petrie C; Tasca A; Williams K J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 17559536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials. Mondon M; Ziegler C Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]