These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19641242)

  • 1. In vivo imaging of irreversible electroporation by means of electrical impedance tomography.
    Granot Y; Ivorra A; Maor E; Rubinsky B
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(16):4927-43. PubMed ID: 19641242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods of optimization of electrical impedance tomography for imaging tissue electroporation.
    Granot Y; Rubinsky B
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1135-47. PubMed ID: 17906383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical impedance tomography for imaging tissue electroporation.
    Davalos RV; Otten DM; Mir LM; Rubinsky B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):761-7. PubMed ID: 15132502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A feasibility study for electrical impedance tomography as a means to monitor tissue electroporation for molecular medicine.
    Davalos RV; Rubinsky B; Otten DM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):400-3. PubMed ID: 11942732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo results of a new focal tissue ablation technique: irreversible electroporation.
    Edd JF; Horowitz L; Davalos RV; Mir LM; Rubinsky B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1409-15. PubMed ID: 16830945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Galvanic apparent internal impedance: an intrinsic tissue property.
    Golberg A; Rabinowitch HD; Rubinsky B
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2009 Nov; 389(1):168-71. PubMed ID: 19715667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple biopsy probe sampling enabled minimally invasive electrical impedance tomography.
    Shini M; Rubinsky B
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jan; 29(1):109-26. PubMed ID: 18175863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electric field modulation in tissue electroporation with electrolytic and non-electrolytic additives.
    Ivorra A; Rubinsky B
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2007 May; 70(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 17350351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Metherall P; Barber DC; Smallwood RH; Brown BH
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6574):509-12. PubMed ID: 8606768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-time management of faulty electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hartinger AE; Guardo R; Adler A; Gagnon H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 56(2):369-77. PubMed ID: 19272943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography for measuring electrical conductivity during electroporation.
    Kranjc M; Bajd F; Serša I; Miklavčič D
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jun; 35(6):985-96. PubMed ID: 24844299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo electrical conductivity measurements during and after tumor electroporation: conductivity changes reflect the treatment outcome.
    Ivorra A; Al-Sakere B; Rubinsky B; Mir LM
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(19):5949-63. PubMed ID: 19759406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography for monitoring electric field distribution during tissue electroporation.
    Kranjc M; Bajd F; Serša I; Miklavčič D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1771-8. PubMed ID: 21521664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two EIT systems suitable for imaging impedance changes in epilepsy.
    Fabrizi L; McEwan A; Oh T; Woo EJ; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S103-20. PubMed ID: 19491447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical estimation of resistance/conductance by electrical impedance tomography measurements.
    Demidenko E; Hartov A; Paulsen K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):829-38. PubMed ID: 15250635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo non-thermal irreversible electroporation impact on rat liver galvanic apparent internal resistance.
    Golberg A; Laufer S; Rabinowitch HD; Rubinsky B
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):951-63. PubMed ID: 21248392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
    Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical field and temperature model of nonthermal irreversible electroporation in heterogeneous tissues.
    Daniels C; Rubinsky B
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jul; 131(7):071006. PubMed ID: 19640131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In situ monitoring of electric field distribution in mouse tumor during electroporation.
    Kranjc M; Markelc B; Bajd F; Čemažar M; Serša I; Blagus T; Miklavčič D
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 25144647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.