BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19641766)

  • 1. Response of maxillary retrusion cases to face mask treatment.
    Ramadan AA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e29-34. PubMed ID: 19641766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
    Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of face mask and tongue plate on maxillary deficiency in growing patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Toumarian L; Jamilian A; Sheibaninia A; Mirkarimi M; Taban T
    J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 23794693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in Class III malocclusions.
    Arman A; Toygar TU; Abuhijleh E
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):733-40. PubMed ID: 15673133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extraoral traction to the maxilla with face mask: a follow-up of 17 consecutively treated patients with and without cleft lip and palate.
    Sarnäs KV; Rune B
    Cleft Palate J; 1987 Apr; 24(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 3472692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of facemask and reverse chin cup on maxillary deficient patients.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Jamilian A; Ghassemi M; Ghassemi A; Taban T; Imani Z
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 22773672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of face mask therapy with and without rapid maxillary expansion in adolescent patients.
    Yavuz I; Halicioğlu K; Ceylan I; Dağsuyu IM; Erdem A
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 22866596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study.
    Masucci C; Franchi L; Defraia E; Mucedero M; Cozza P; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 21967936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term results in maxillary deficiency using intraoral devices.
    Rachmiel A; Aizenbud D; Peled M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 16053864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on the Maxillary Growth: Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
    Seo J; Kim S; Yang IH; Baek SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2128-32. PubMed ID: 26468796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation.
    Farronato G; Maspero C; Esposito L; Briguglio E; Farronato D; Giannini L
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21059876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.