160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19642783)
1. Multidetector CTA in the quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: value of different reformation techniques and axial source images compared with selective carotid arteriography.
Puchner S; Popovic M; Wolf F; Reiter M; Lammer J; Bucek RA
J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Jun; 16(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 19642783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multidetector CT angiography in the follow-up of patients treated with renal artery stents: value of different reformation techniques compared with axial source images.
Puchner S; Stadler A; Minar E; Lammer J; Bucek RA
J Endovasc Ther; 2007 Jun; 14(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 17723005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated CTA quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: a pilot trial.
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Kanitsar A; Rand T; Lammer J
J Endovasc Ther; 2007 Feb; 14(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 17291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carotid bifurcation calcium and correlation with percent stenosis of the internal carotid artery on CT angiography.
McKinney AM; Casey SO; Teksam M; Lucato LT; Smith M; Truwit CL; Kieffer S
Neuroradiology; 2005 Jan; 47(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15650832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering.
Leclerc X; Godefroy O; Lucas C; Benhaim JF; Michel TS; Leys D; Pruvo JP
Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 10207466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CTA quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: application of luminal area vs. luminal diameter measurements and assessment of inter-observer variability.
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Haumer M; Reiter M; Minar E; Lammer J
J Neuroimaging; 2007 Jul; 17(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 17608907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparative analysis of different flow velocity criteria and multidetector computed tomographic angiography.
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Haumer M; Rand T; Sabeti S; Minar E; Lammer J
J Endovasc Ther; 2006 Apr; 13(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 16643072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: can CTA overcome the confusion?
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Haumer M; Rand T; Minar E; Lammer J
J Endovasc Ther; 2006 Aug; 13(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 16928157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique.
Marcus CD; Ladam-Marcus VJ; Bigot JL; Clement C; Baehrel B; Menanteau BP
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):775-80. PubMed ID: 10352606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic sensitivity of multidetector-row spiral computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of type-II endoleaks and their source: comparison between axial scans and reformatting techniques.
Saba L; Pascalis L; Montisci R; Sanfilippo R; Mallarini G
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 18568554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volumetric assessment of the carotid bifurcation: an alternative concept to stenosis grading.
Miralles M; Arrébola M; Bruguer S; Lago A; Lara R
Ann Vasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 29(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 25591486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences between MIP and MPR techniques in the carotid artery stenosis degree measurement. Evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiograph.
Saba L; Mallarini G
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Feb; 56(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 18432165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.
Marks MP; Napel S; Jordan JE; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 8498231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multidetector-row CT angiography diagnostic sensitivity in evaluation of renal artery stenosis: comparison between multiple reconstruction techniques.
Saba L; Caddeo G; Sanfilippo R; Montisci R; Mallarini G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):712-6. PubMed ID: 17895781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Measurement and Grading of Carotid Stenosis with Computed Tomography Angiography and Doppler Ultrasound.
Birmpili P; Porter L; Shaikh U; Torella F
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 51():217-224. PubMed ID: 29522870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximum stenosis of extracranial internal carotid artery: effect of luminal morphology on stenosis measurement by using CT angiography and conventional DSA.
Hirai T; Korogi Y; Ono K; Murata Y; Takahashi M; Suginohara K; Uemura S
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):802-9. PubMed ID: 11719682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography.
Bartlett ES; Walters TD; Symons SP; Fox AJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16418349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
Leclerc X; Godefroy O; Pruvo JP; Leys D
Stroke; 1995 Sep; 26(9):1577-81. PubMed ID: 7660401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
