These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1037 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19643221)

  • 1. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of tooth preparation burs on the roughness and bond strength of adhesives to human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Maghrabi AA; Saif RE; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2011 Jun; 24(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 21874939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Hassan MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Feb; 75(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 8667268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface roughness and wettability of enamel and dentine surfaces prepared with different dental burs.
    Al-Omari WM; Mitchell CA; Cunningham JL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 28(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 11422697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Salama M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 9051596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of different grit sizes of diamond rotary instruments for tooth preparation on the retention and adaptation of complete coverage restorations.
    Li YQ; Wang H; Wang YJ; Chen JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 22304742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 9484147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Kulunk S; Kulunk T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 16198174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of ultrasonic instruments on the quality of preparation margins and bonding to dentin.
    Ellis R; Bennani V; Purton D; Chandler N; Lowe B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Aug; 24(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 22863135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of cutting instruments on permeability and morphology of the dentin surface.
    Sekimoto T; Derkson GD; Richardson AS
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 10530274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: an index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction.
    Schmidlin PR; Göhring TN
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 14753337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures.
    Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Serra MC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jul; 21(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 15978273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of rotary instruments on composites for coronal restoration. A proposed evaluation protocol for the effect of rotary instruments and surface conditions].
    Ache M; Goldberg M; Lefort A; Renaux P
    Cah Prothese; 1991 Jun; (74):56-68. PubMed ID: 1650285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite enamel and composite dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part I: roughness after treatments with tungsten carbide vs diamond burs.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):70-89. PubMed ID: 24757700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins.
    Kuhar M; Funduk N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15624002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of oscillating and rotary cutting instruments with electric and turbine handpieces on tooth preparation surfaces.
    Geminiani A; Abdel-Azim T; Ercoli C; Feng C; Meirelles L; Massironi D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24726596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium.
    Reddy ES; Patil NP; Guttal SS; Jagadish HG
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.