863 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19643478)
1. Supreme court of Canada's "Beautiful Mind" case.
Gray JE; O'Reilly RL
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 19643478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to refuse treatment: recent Canadian developments.
Gratzer TG; Matas M
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 7949413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
Klein DW
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
Mossman D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Starson v. Swayze: the Supreme Court speaks out (not all that clearly) on the question of "capacity".
Sklar R
Can J Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 52(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 17696026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Judges confirm the fundamental right to physical integrity].
Weber M
Pflege Z; 2012 Oct; 65(10):626-8. PubMed ID: 23098036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The involuntary medication of Jared Loughner and pretrial jail detainees in nonmedical correctional facilities.
Felthous AR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 22396347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Ninth Circuit's Loughner decision neglected medically appropriate treatment.
Felthous AR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 23503184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment refusal in the involuntarily hospitalized psychiatric population: Canadian policy and practice.
Gupta M
Med Law; 2001; 20(2):245-65. PubMed ID: 11495208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Ontario Mental Health Act: a review of District Court "competence" decisions.
Chandrasena R
Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):15-9, 31. PubMed ID: 10114433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ontario's new law of consent to treatment: potential for liability.
Campbell CL
Leadersh Health Serv; 1995; 4(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10144383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Extra information about treatment is too much for the patient with psychosis.
Kennedy M; Dornan J; Rutledge E; O'Neill H; Kennedy HG
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 19793614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Involuntary patients' right to refuse medication: impact of the Riese decision on a California inpatient unit.
Binder RL; McNiel DE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 1686192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Involuntary electro-convulsive therapy to restore competency to stand trial: a five year study in New York State.
Ladds B
J Forensic Sci; 1995 Mar; 40(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 7602274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
