127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19644321)
1. A meta-analysis of circumferential fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine.
Han X; Zhu Y; Cui C; Wu Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(17):E618-25. PubMed ID: 19644321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis of instrumented posterior interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine.
Zhou ZJ; Zhao FD; Fang XQ; Zhao X; Fan SW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Sep; 15(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 21619404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion.
Madan SS; Boeree NR
Eur Spine J; 2003 Dec; 12(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 14673717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of sagittal spinal balance, levels of posterior instrumentation, and length of follow-up on low back pain in patients undergoing posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a multifactorial analysis.
Korovessis P; Repantis T; Papazisis Z; Iliopoulos P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):898-905. PubMed ID: 20354466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of circumferential fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Liu XY; Wang YP; Qiu GX; Weng XS; Yu B
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Dec; 27(8):E282-93. PubMed ID: 24901880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Meta-analysis of lumbar posterolateral fusion versus circumferential fusion in the treatment of the lumbar disease].
Cui C; Zhu Y; Han XX
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Sep; 47(18):1374-8. PubMed ID: 20092769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients.
Christensen FB; Hansen ES; Eiskjaer SP; Høy K; Helmig P; Neumann P; Niedermann B; Bünger CE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Dec; 27(23):2674-83. PubMed ID: 12461393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and radiological relationship between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral lumbar fusion.
Lidar Z; Beaumont A; Lifshutz J; Maiman DJ
Surg Neurol; 2005 Oct; 64(4):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 16181997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of a hybrid dynamic stabilization and fusion system in the lumbar spine: preliminary experience.
Maserati MB; Tormenti MJ; Panczykowski DM; Bonfield CM; Gerszten PC
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E2. PubMed ID: 20568918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone marrow aspirate with allograft as alternatives to autograft in instrumented revision posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a minimum two-year follow-up study.
Taghavi CE; Lee KB; Keorochana G; Tzeng ST; Yoo JH; Wang JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1144-50. PubMed ID: 20139805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.
Videbaek TS; Christensen FB; Soegaard R; Hansen ES; Høy K; Helmig P; Niedermann B; Eiskjoer SP; Bünger CE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):2875-80. PubMed ID: 17139217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion for patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis.
Wu CH; Wong CB; Chen LH; Niu CC; Tsai TT; Chen WJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jul; 21(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 18600138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the optimum fusion technique for adult spondylolisthesis-PLIF or PLF or PLIF plus PLF? A meta-analysis from 17 comparative studies.
Liu XY; Qiu GX; Weng XS; Yu B; Wang YP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22):1887-98. PubMed ID: 25099321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis.
Gibson JN; Grant IC; Waddell G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1820-32. PubMed ID: 10488513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine.
Kim KT; Lee SH; Lee YH; Bae SC; Suk KS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1351-7; discussion 1358. PubMed ID: 16721298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion for the Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.
Luo J; Cao K; Yu T; Li L; Huang S; Gong M; Cao C; Zou X
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Aug; 30(7):E915-E922. PubMed ID: 28746129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional and radiological outcomes of 360 degrees fusion of three or more motion levels in the lumbar spine for degenerative disc disease.
Suratwala SJ; Pinto MR; Gilbert TJ; Winter RB; Wroblewski JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):E351-8. PubMed ID: 19404164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain.
Soegaard R; Bünger CE; Christiansen T; Høy K; Eiskjaer SP; Christensen FB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2405-14. PubMed ID: 18090078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic review with meta-analysis of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Liu X; Wang Y; Qiu G; Weng X; Yu B
Eur Spine J; 2014 Jan; 23(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 23812825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
