BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19645096)

  • 1. Is the ECx a legitimate surrogate for a NOEC?
    Fox DR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):351-3. PubMed ID: 19645096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new perspective on the Dunnett procedure: filling the gap between NOEC/LOEC and ECx concepts.
    Delignette-Muller ML; Forfait C; Billoir E; Charles S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2888-91. PubMed ID: 21932292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical analysis of regulatory ecotoxicity tests.
    Isnard P; Flammarion P; Roman G; Babut M; Bastien P; Bintein S; Esserméant L; Férard JF; Gallotti-Schmitt S; Saouter E; Saroli M; Thiébaud H; Tomassone R; Vindimian E
    Chemosphere; 2001 Nov; 45(4-5):659-69. PubMed ID: 11680762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative robustness of NOEC and ECx against large uncertainties in data.
    Tanaka Y; Nakamura K; Yokomizo H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206901. PubMed ID: 30485303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculation of the minimum significant difference at the NOEC using a non-parametric test.
    van der Hoeven N
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2008 May; 70(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 17659775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the integration of hormesis and essentiality into ecotoxicology now opening Pandora's Box?
    Kefford BJ; Zalizniak L; Warne MS; Nugegoda D
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Feb; 151(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 17559995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New technique for estimating thresholds of toxicity in ecological risk assessment.
    Hanson ML; Solomon KR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Aug; 36(15):3257-64. PubMed ID: 12188350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation and comparison of the relationship between NOEC and EC10 or EC20 values in chronic Daphnia toxicity testing.
    Beasley A; Belanger SE; Brill JL; Otter RR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2378-84. PubMed ID: 26033640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simplifying complexity: Mixture toxicity assessment in the last 20 years.
    Altenburger R; Backhaus T; Boedeker W; Faust M; Scholze M
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1685-7. PubMed ID: 23843317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models.
    Jager T; Heugens EH; Kooijman SA
    Ecotoxicology; 2006 Apr; 15(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 16739032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Derived Reference Doses (RfDs) for the environmental degradates of the herbicides alachlor and acetochlor: results of an independent expert panel deliberation.
    Gadagbui B; Maier A; Dourson M; Parker A; Willis A; Christopher JP; Hicks L; Ramasamy S; Roberts SM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010; 57(2-3):220-34. PubMed ID: 20206657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time to get off the fence: the need for definitive international guidance on statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data.
    van Dam RA; Harford AJ; Warne MS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 22308052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proposing a vigorous hybrid of the LOEC and ECx.
    deBruyn AM; Elphick JR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Apr; 9(2):345-7. PubMed ID: 23529808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical comparisons of the no-observed-effect concentration and the effective concentration at 10% inhibition (EC10) in algal toxicity tests.
    Shieh JN; Chao MR; Chen CY
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 11380172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tolerance: a useful biological parameter for identifying contaminated sites.
    Otitoloju AA; Are TA
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2003 Dec; 71(6):1139-44. PubMed ID: 14756281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photosensor of environmental persistence for chemical risk assessment.
    Campanella L; Costanza C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Jan; 72(1):261-272. PubMed ID: 18786725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of fish-derived cell lines for investigation of environmental contaminants.
    Dayeh VR; Bols NC; Schirmer K; Lee LE
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2003; Chapter 1():Unit 1.5. PubMed ID: 22522581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advancements of Xenobiotic Toxicity Screening for the Advancement of Human Health.
    Kankanamage RNT; Sefcikova J
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2021 Jul; 34(7):1699-1700. PubMed ID: 34110791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reluctant comment on Fox et al. (2012): On being dragged into the NOEC squabble.
    Newman MC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):767. PubMed ID: 22987525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NOEC: notable oversight of enlightened Canadians: a response to van Dam et al. (2012).
    Van der Vliet L; Taylor LN; Scroggins R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):397-8; author reply 399-400. PubMed ID: 22707418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.