These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19645096)

  • 21. Bad habits die hard: the NOEC's persistence reflects poorly on ecotoxicology.
    Jager T
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Feb; 31(2):228-9. PubMed ID: 22095471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vision & strategy: Predictive ecotoxicology in the 21st century.
    Villeneuve DL; Garcia-Reyero N
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 21182100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceutical drug substances--conceptual considerations.
    Länge R; Dietrich D
    Toxicol Lett; 2002 May; 131(1-2):97-104. PubMed ID: 11988362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems.
    De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 18774172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bridging the divide between human and environmental nanotoxicology.
    Malysheva A; Lombi E; Voelcker NH
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2015 Oct; 10(10):835-44. PubMed ID: 26440721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of OECD Test Guidelines and Hazard Assessment procedures for terrestrial effects [Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development].
    Grandy NJ
    Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1995; 17():397-405. PubMed ID: 7786176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity comparison of laboratory-cultured and field-collected amphipod Corophium multisetosum in toxicity tests.
    Menchaca I; Belzunce MJ; Franco J; Garmendia JM; Montero N; Revilla M
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 84(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 20306172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A novel toxicity fingerprinting method for pollutant identification with lux-marked biosensors.
    Turner NL; Horsburgh A; Paton GI; Killham K; Meharg A; Primrose S; Strachan NJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Nov; 20(11):2456-61. PubMed ID: 11699769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The future of toxicity testing.
    Andersen ME; Al-Zoughool M; Croteau M; Westphal M; Krewski D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):163-96. PubMed ID: 20574896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 10th Anniversary Critical Review: The tissue-residue approach for toxicity assessment: concepts, issues, application, and recommendations.
    Meador JP; McCarty LS; Escher BI; Adams WJ
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Dec; 10(12):1486-98. PubMed ID: 19037491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Toward a consistent evaluative framework for POP risk characterization.
    Arnot JA; Armitage JM; McCarty LS; Wania F; Cousins IT; Toose-Reid L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 21053945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency strategic plan for evaluating the toxicity of chemicals.
    Firestone M; Kavlock R; Zenick H; Kramer M;
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):139-62. PubMed ID: 20574895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A basic study on the biological monitoring for vanadium-effects of vanadium on Vero cells and the evaluation of intracellular vanadium contents.
    Mochizuki M; Kudo E; Kikuchi M; Takano T; Taniuchi Y; Kitamura T; Hondo R; Ueda F
    Biol Trace Elem Res; 2011 Jul; 142(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 20556539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adverse outcome pathway: Framework, application, and challenges in chemical risk assessment.
    Zhou B
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Sep; 35():191-193. PubMed ID: 26354708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition assay for ecotoxicity assessment: A review.
    Abbas M; Adil M; Ehtisham-Ul-Haque S; Munir B; Yameen M; Ghaffar A; Shar GA; Asif Tahir M; Iqbal M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 626():1295-1309. PubMed ID: 29898537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enhancing toxicity test performance by using a statistical criterion.
    Denton DL; Fox JF; Fulk FA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Oct; 22(10):2323-8. PubMed ID: 14551995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Results of analysis of ratios of indices of toxic and sensory effect of chemicals].
    Novikov SM; Shashina TA
    Gig Sanit; 2013; (6):78-80. PubMed ID: 24624828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An exploration of the relationship between adsorption and bioavailability of pesticides in soil to earthworm.
    Yu YL; Wu XM; Li SN; Fang H; Zhan HY; Yu JQ
    Environ Pollut; 2006 Jun; 141(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 16274907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new use for transgenic plants--environmental biomonitors.
    Kovalchuk I; Kovalchuk O
    Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev; 2003; 20():23-45. PubMed ID: 14997845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Methodological considerations for testing the ecotoxicity of carbon nanotubes and fullerenes: review.
    Petersen EJ; Henry TB
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Jan; 31(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 21994158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.