221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19645304)
1. Biomechanical methods applied in dentistry: a comparative overview of photoelastic examinations, strain gauge measurements, finite element analysis and three-dimensional deformation analysis.
Karl M; Dickinson A; Holst S; Holst A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):50-7. PubMed ID: 19645304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 11951799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanics studies in dentistry: bioengineering applied in oral implantology.
Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; Gomes EA; Delben JA; dos Santos PH
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19568186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants.
Eser A; Akça K; Eckert S; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 19587865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements.
Winter W; Taylor TD; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1288-95. PubMed ID: 22167435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16672032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results.
Winter W; Mohrle S; Holst S; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):947-52. PubMed ID: 20862408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fixation of 5-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures and resulting bone loading: a finite element assessment based on in vivo strain measurements.
Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):756-62. PubMed ID: 17066637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Hsu ML; Chen FC; Kao HC; Cheng CK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17465356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study.
Ozçelik T; Ersoy AE
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17362420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of stress analysis methods to evaluate the biomechanics of oral rehabilitation with implants.
Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; Filho HG; Monteiro DR; Santos DM; Haddad MF; Pellizzer EP
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 24779954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress distribution after installation of fixed frameworks with marginal gaps over angled and parallel implants: a photoelastic analysis.
Markarian RA; Ueda C; Sendyk CL; Laganá DC; Souza RM
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 17362421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
