These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19645304)
1. Biomechanical methods applied in dentistry: a comparative overview of photoelastic examinations, strain gauge measurements, finite element analysis and three-dimensional deformation analysis. Karl M; Dickinson A; Holst S; Holst A Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):50-7. PubMed ID: 19645304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants. Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 11951799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants. Eser A; Akça K; Eckert S; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 19587865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements. Winter W; Taylor TD; Karl M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1288-95. PubMed ID: 22167435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements. Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16672032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant. Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results. Winter W; Mohrle S; Holst S; Karl M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):947-52. PubMed ID: 20862408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths. Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants. Akça K; Cehreli MC Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fixation of 5-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures and resulting bone loading: a finite element assessment based on in vivo strain measurements. Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):756-62. PubMed ID: 17066637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Hsu ML; Chen FC; Kao HC; Cheng CK Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17465356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study. Ozçelik T; Ersoy AE J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17362420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants. Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures. Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of stress analysis methods to evaluate the biomechanics of oral rehabilitation with implants. Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; Filho HG; Monteiro DR; Santos DM; Haddad MF; Pellizzer EP J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 24779954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress distribution after installation of fixed frameworks with marginal gaps over angled and parallel implants: a photoelastic analysis. Markarian RA; Ueda C; Sendyk CL; Laganá DC; Souza RM J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 17362421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]