179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19645518)
1. A comparison of treatment plans using linac-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma.
Kim S; Lee I; Kim YB; Koom WS; Jeon BC; Lee CG; Kim GE; Keum KC
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Aug; 8(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 19645518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-precision radiotherapy for craniospinal irradiation: evaluation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical TomoTherapy.
Sharma DS; Gupta T; Jalali R; Master Z; Phurailatpam RD; Sarin R
Br J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 82(984):1000-9. PubMed ID: 19581313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric comparisons of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and helical tomotherapy in whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancy.
Kim YB; Kim JH; Jeong KK; Seong J; Suh CO; Kim GE
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Oct; 8(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 19754213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which is the most optimal technique to spare hippocampus?-Dosimetric comparisons of SCRT, IMRT, and tomotherapy.
Kothavade V; Jamema SV; Gupta T; Pungavkar S; Upasani M; Juvekar S; Jalali R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 26148600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Dosimetric comparison of the helical tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in radical radiotherapy for esophageal cancer].
Xu YJ; Li P; Hu X; Wang J; Ma HL; Chen M
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 99(41):3260-3265. PubMed ID: 31694123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT radiation modalities in treating brain and cranio-spinal tumors.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Delichas MG; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Feb; 8(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19166237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy treatment and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy of retroperitoneal sarcoma.
Pezner RD; Liu A; Han C; Chen YJ; Schultheiss TE; Wong JY
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Oct; 81(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 17005280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose-volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays.
Hayashi A; Shibamoto Y; Hattori Y; Tamura T; Iwabuchi M; Otsuka S; Sugie C; Yanagi T
J Radiat Res; 2015 Mar; 56(2):338-45. PubMed ID: 25609741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Helical tomotherapy for radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: a preferred plan with better conformal target coverage and more homogeneous dose distribution.
Chen YJ; Liu A; Han C; Tsai PT; Schultheiss TE; Pezner RD; Vora N; Lim D; Shibata S; Kernstine KH; Wong JY
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 17707195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sparing the penile bulb in the radical irradiation of clinically localised prostate carcinoma: A comparison between MRI and CT prostatic apex definition in 3DCRT, Linac-IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy.
Perna L; Fiorino C; Cozzarini C; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; De Cobelli F; Mangili P; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 19410316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Compared planning dosimetry of TOMO, VMAT and IMRT in rectal cancer with different simulated positions.
Lin JC; Tsai JT; Chen LJ; Li MH; Liu WH
Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(26):42020-42029. PubMed ID: 28159930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Lee TF; Fang FM; Chao PJ; Su TJ; Wang LK; Leung SW
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Oct; 89(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 18524401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A dosimetric comparison of non-coplanar IMRT versus Helical Tomotherapy for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Read PW
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 17275112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study.
Lian J; Yuan L; Ge Y; Chera BS; Yoo DP; Chang S; Yin F; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121704. PubMed ID: 24320490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
