These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19645523)

  • 1. Performance of a commercial Macro Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for determining output factors of clinical electron fields.
    Popple RA; Brezovich IA; Pareek PN; Duan J; Shen S; Wu X
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Aug; 8(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 19645523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo commissioning of clinical electron beams using large field measurements.
    O'Shea TP; Sawkey DL; Foley MJ; Faddegon BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4083-105. PubMed ID: 20601775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental verification and clinical implementation of a commercial Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculation algorithm.
    Fragoso M; Pillai S; Solberg TD; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1028-38. PubMed ID: 18404938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Final Aperture Superposition Technique applied to fast calculation of electron output factors and depth dose curves.
    Faddegon BA; Villarreal-Barajas JE
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3286-94. PubMed ID: 16370417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First macro Monte Carlo based commercial dose calculation module for electron beam treatment planning--new issues for clinical consideration.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW; Shokrani P; Cygler JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2781-99. PubMed ID: 16723766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte carlo electron source model validation for an Elekta Precise linac.
    Ali OA; Willemse CA; Shaw W; O'Reilly FH; du Plessis FC
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2366-73. PubMed ID: 21776771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experimental validation of a Monte Carlo-based treatment-planning system for electron beams].
    Mika S; Christ G
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Mar; 183(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 17340074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dosimetric comparison of copper and Cerrobend electron inserts.
    Rusk BD; Carver RL; Gibbons JP; Hogstrom KR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):245–261. PubMed ID: 27685126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a new commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams.
    Vandervoort EJ; Tchistiakova E; La Russa DJ; Cygler JE
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021711. PubMed ID: 24506602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo dose calculation improvements for low energy electron beams using eMC.
    Fix MK; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Manser P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4577-88. PubMed ID: 20668339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
    Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
    Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
    Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electron dosimetry of angular fields.
    Davies G; Bidmead M; Lamb C; Nalder C; Seco J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Mar; 80(951):202-8. PubMed ID: 17303615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo calculations of output factors for clinically shaped electron fields.
    Turian JV; Smith BD; Bernard DA; Griem KL; Chu JC
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(2):42-63. PubMed ID: 15738912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of an extendable multi-leaf collimator for clinical electron beams.
    O'Shea TP; Ge Y; Foley MJ; Faddegon BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 56(23):7621-38. PubMed ID: 22086242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of an extra-focal electron source to model collimator-scattered electrons using the pencil-beam redefinition algorithm.
    Boyd RA; Hogstrom KR; White RA; Antolak JA
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2571-83. PubMed ID: 12462724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalized eMC implementation for Monte Carlo dose calculation of electron beams from different machine types.
    Fix MK; Cygler J; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Manser P
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 May; 58(9):2841-59. PubMed ID: 23563175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
    Treutwein M; Bogner L
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Monte Carlo approach to validation of FFF VMAT treatment plans for the TrueBeam linac.
    Gete E; Duzenli C; Milette MP; Mestrovic A; Hyde D; Bergman AM; Teke T
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021707. PubMed ID: 23387730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.