603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19646149)
1. Genetic evaluation of Australian dairy cattle for somatic cell scores using multi-trait random regression test-day model.
Konstantinov KV; Beard KT; Goddard ME; van der Werf JH
J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Jun; 126(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19646149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of a test day model for dairy goat milk yield across lactations in Germany.
Zumbach B; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Peters KJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Jun; 125(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 18479266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins.
Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5314-25. PubMed ID: 19762849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic evaluation of somatic cell score in dairy cattle considering first and later lactations as two different but correlated traits.
Negussie E; Koivula M; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer M
J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Aug; 123(4):224-38. PubMed ID: 16882089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of random regression models with Legendre polynomials and linear splines for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holstein cows.
Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J; Misztal I; Sullivan PG
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3627-38. PubMed ID: 18765621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Random herd curves in a test-day model for milk, fat, and protein production of dairy cattle in The Netherlands.
de Roos AP; Harbers AG; de Jong G
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2693-701. PubMed ID: 15328295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Derivation and calculation of approximate reliabilities and daughter yield-deviations of a random regression test-day model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle.
Liu Z; Reinhardt F; Bünger A; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jun; 87(6):1896-907. PubMed ID: 15453507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic evaluation of bulls and cows with single- and multiple-country test-day models.
Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Weigel KA
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 12146495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic evaluation of fertility traits of dairy cattle using a multiple-trait animal model.
Liu Z; Jaitner J; Reinhardt F; Pasman E; Rensing S; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4333-43. PubMed ID: 18946139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic analysis of milk production traits of polish black and white cattle using large-scale random regression test-day models.
Strabel T; Jamrozik J
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Aug; 89(8):3152-63. PubMed ID: 16840632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of robust procedures for estimation of breeding values in multiple-trait random regression test-day model.
Jamrozik J; Fatehi J; Schaeffer LR
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Feb; 124(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 17302954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic components of heat stress for dairy cattle with multiple lactations.
Aguilar I; Misztal I; Tsuruta S
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Nov; 92(11):5702-11. PubMed ID: 19841230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Joint international evaluation of Milking Shorthorn dairy cattle for production traits.
Barrett R; Miglior F; Jansen G; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3326-36. PubMed ID: 16107423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic correlations among production, body size, udder, and productive life traits over time in Holsteins.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2004 May; 87(5):1457-68. PubMed ID: 15290995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic parameters for tunisian holsteins using a test-day random regression model.
Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Ben Gara A; Gengler N
J Dairy Sci; 2008 May; 91(5):2118-26. PubMed ID: 18420643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationships between milk yield and somatic cell score in Canadian Holsteins from simultaneous and recursive random regression models.
Jamrozik J; Bohmanova J; Schaeffer LR
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1216-33. PubMed ID: 20172242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of random regression test-day models for Polish Black and White cattle.
Strabel T; Szyda J; Ptak E; Jamrozik J
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Oct; 88(10):3688-99. PubMed ID: 16162544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimates of genetic parameters for Holstein cows for test-day yield traits with a random regression cubic spline model.
DeGroot BJ; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Kachman SD
Genet Mol Res; 2007 Jun; 6(2):434-44. PubMed ID: 17952867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
