BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19646611)

  • 21. Editorial comment on: robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases.
    Artibani W
    Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):750-1. PubMed ID: 17329018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pelvic lymph node dissection is associated with symptomatic venous thromboembolism risk during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Eifler JB; Levinson AW; Hyndman ME; Trock BJ; Pavlovich CP
    J Urol; 2011 May; 185(5):1661-5. PubMed ID: 21419428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Editorial comment.
    Secin FP
    J Urol; 2011 May; 185(5):1666. PubMed ID: 21419443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Editorial comment on: Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: description of the surgical technique and initial results.
    Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1355-6. PubMed ID: 17719719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Editorial comment on: Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: description of the surgical technique and initial results.
    Bianco FJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1356-7. PubMed ID: 17719718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men aged > or =70 years.
    Singh R; Hicks JA
    BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(6):886-7. PubMed ID: 20353539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the new gold standard?
    Wirth MP; Froehner M
    Eur Urol; 2010 May; 57(5):750-1; author reply 752-3. PubMed ID: 20106586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is robot-assisted radical prostatectomy safer than other radical prostatectomy techniques?
    Marberger M
    Eur Urol; 2011 May; 59(5):699-700; discussion 701. PubMed ID: 21353381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Are functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than those obtained with other surgical approaches?].
    RouprĂȘt M
    Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):617-8. PubMed ID: 19800551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Technique of radical retropubic prostatectomy with limited pelvic node dissection.
    Lieskovsky G; Skinner DG
    Urol Clin North Am; 1983 Feb; 10(1):187-98. PubMed ID: 6340313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Editorial comment on: Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Vickers AJ
    Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):802-3. PubMed ID: 18514384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Editorial comment on: Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Shariat SF
    Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):803-4. PubMed ID: 18514382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Editorial comment.
    Ghazi A
    Urology; 2011 Apr; 77(4):967-8; author reply 968. PubMed ID: 21477725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perioperative complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy for Stages C and D1 prostate cancer.
    Patterson DE; Zincke H
    Urology; 1984 Mar; 23(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 6702037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node excision in prostatic carcinoma].
    Heidenreich A; Hammerer P
    Aktuelle Urol; 2005 Sep; 36(5):439-56; quiz 457-9. PubMed ID: 16163607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Editorial comment.
    Urology; 2010 May; 75(5):1204-5; author reply 1205. PubMed ID: 20451746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Morbidity of pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy for prostatic cancer.
    McCullough DL; McLaughlin AP; Gittes RF
    J Urol; 1977 Feb; 117(2):206-7. PubMed ID: 833970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Should pelvic lymph node dissection be performed with radical prostatectomy? No.
    Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1284-5. PubMed ID: 20171675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Complications of radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy.
    Peters PC
    Urol Clin North Am; 1988 May; 15(2):219-21. PubMed ID: 3381368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should pelvic lymph node dissection be performed with radical prostatectomy? Yes.
    Studer UE
    J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 20181363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.