These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19646828)

  • 1. Time-lapse resistivity surveys over simulated clandestine graves.
    Jervis JR; Pringle JK; Tuckwell GW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):7-13. PubMed ID: 19646828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground-penetrating radar methods: 0-3 years after burial.
    Pringle JK; Jervis JR; Hansen JD; Jones GM; Cassidy NJ; Cassella JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov; 57(6):1467-86. PubMed ID: 22509973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time-lapse geophysical investigations over a simulated urban clandestine grave.
    Pringle JK; Jervis J; Cassella JP; Cassidy NJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Nov; 53(6):1405-16. PubMed ID: 18808369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical resistivity survey to search for a recent clandestine burial of a homicide victim, UK.
    Pringle JK; Jervis JR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Oct; 202(1-3):e1-7. PubMed ID: 20471188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary soilwater conductivity analysis to date clandestine burials of homicide victims.
    Pringle JK; Cassella JP; Jervis JR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 May; 198(1-3):126-33. PubMed ID: 20211533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlled GPR grave research: comparison of reflection profiles between 500 and 250 MHz antennae.
    Schultz JJ; Martin MM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):64-9. PubMed ID: 21237591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term Geophysical Monitoring of Simulated Clandestine Graves using Electrical and Ground Penetrating Radar Methods: 4-6 Years After Burial.
    Pringle JK; Jervis JR; Roberts D; Dick HC; Wisniewski KD; Cassidy NJ; Cassella JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):309-321. PubMed ID: 27404604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing forensic search methodologies and geophysical surveying for the detection of clandestine graves in coastal beach environments.
    Pringle JK; Holland C; Szkornik K; Harrison M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):e29-36. PubMed ID: 22285503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geophysical monitoring of simulated graves with resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, conductivity and GPR in Colombia, South America.
    Molina CM; Pringle JK; Saumett M; Evans GT
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():106-15. PubMed ID: 26921813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The suitability of using domestic pigs (Sus spp.) as human proxies in the geophysical detection of clandestine graves.
    Berezowski V; Moffat I; Seckiner D; Crebert I; Ellis J; Mallett X
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):316-328. PubMed ID: 37904624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moisture can be the dominant environmental parameter governing cadaver decomposition in soil.
    Carter DO; Yellowlees D; Tibbett M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jul; 200(1-3):60-6. PubMed ID: 20400249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential monitoring of burials containing small pig cadavers using ground penetrating radar.
    Schultz JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Mar; 53(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 18366561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary results of sequential monitoring of simulated clandestine graves in Colombia, South America, using ground penetrating radar and botany.
    Molina CM; Pringle JK; Saumett M; Hernández O
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():61-70. PubMed ID: 25596556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The forensic geophysical controlled research site of the University of Brasilia, Brazil: Results from methods GPR and electrical resistivity tomography.
    Cavalcanti MM; Rocha MP; Blum MLB; Borges WR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Dec; 293():101.e1-101.e21. PubMed ID: 30384988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clandestine burial in Costa Rica: prospection and excavation.
    Congram DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):793-6. PubMed ID: 18489555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using ninhydrin to detect gravesoil.
    Carter DO; Yellowlees D; Tibbett M
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Mar; 53(2):397-400. PubMed ID: 18366573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling the buried human body environment in upland climes using three contrasting field sites.
    Wilson AS; Janaway RC; Holland AD; Dodson HI; Baran E; Pollard AM; Tobin DJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jun; 169(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 16973322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring of simulated clandestine graves of dismembered victims using UAVs, electrical tomography, and GPR over one year to aid investigations of human rights violations in Colombia, South America.
    Molina CM; Wisniewski K; Heaton V; Pringle JK; Avila EF; Herrera LA; Guerrero J; Saumett M; Echeverry R; Duarte M; Baena A
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34927732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Taphonomic mycota: fungi with forensic potential.
    Carter DO; Tibbett M
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):168-71. PubMed ID: 12570221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geophysical imaging of buried human remains in simulated mass and single graves: Experiment design and results from pre-burial to six months after burial.
    Doro KO; Kolapkar AM; Bank CG; Wescott DJ; Mickleburgh HL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jun; 335():111289. PubMed ID: 35397358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.