These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19647362)

  • 1. Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys.
    Maguire KB
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3528-33. PubMed ID: 19647362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone.
    Harewood GC; Yacavone RF; Locke GR; Wiersema MJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 96(12):3312-7. PubMed ID: 11774942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods.
    Fleming CM; Bowden M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):284-92. PubMed ID: 18082316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Web and mail surveys for studying secondary consequences associated with substance use: evidence for minimal mode effects.
    McCabe SE; Couper MP; Cranford JA; Boyd CJ
    Addict Behav; 2006 Jan; 31(1):162-8. PubMed ID: 15916862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mail and telephone in assessing patient experiences in receiving care from medical group practices.
    Hepner KA; Brown JA; Hays RD
    Eval Health Prof; 2005 Dec; 28(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 16272420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results.
    Hall MF
    J Health Care Mark; 1995; 15(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 10142388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
    Sibbald B; Addington-Hall J; Brenneman D; Freeling P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):297-300. PubMed ID: 8068375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying predictors of survey mode preference.
    Smyth JD; Olson K; Millar MM
    Soc Sci Res; 2014 Nov; 48():135-44. PubMed ID: 25131280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Obtaining information on patient satisfaction with hospital care: mail versus telephone.
    Walker AH; Restuccia JD
    Health Serv Res; 1984 Aug; 19(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 6746294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Telephone vs. mail survey gives different SF-36 quality-of-life scores among cancer survivors.
    Buskirk TD; Stein KD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1049-55. PubMed ID: 18538997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Reproducibility of pediatric information collected with various methods: postal/telephone questionnaire and direct interview].
    Currò V; Bembo V; Procaccini M; Buffetti A; Arcà M
    Pediatr Med Chir; 1992; 14(6):627-31. PubMed ID: 1298939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of survey mode and asking about future intentions on self-reports of colorectal cancer screening.
    Beebe TJ; Jenkins SM; Anderson KJ; Davern ME; Rockwood TH
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):785-90. PubMed ID: 18381470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Address-based versus random-digit-dial surveys: comparison of key health and risk indicators.
    Link MW; Battaglia MP; Frankel MR; Osborn L; Mokdad AH
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 164(10):1019-25. PubMed ID: 16968861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
    Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
    Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mixed-mode administration reduced bias and enhanced poststratification adjustments in a health behavior survey.
    Baines AD; Partin MR; Davern M; Rockwood TH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1246-55. PubMed ID: 17998079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost.
    Greenlaw C; Brown-Welty S
    Eval Rev; 2009 Oct; 33(5):464-80. PubMed ID: 19605623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.
    McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing perceptions of cancer risk: does mode of assessment or numeracy matter?
    Kelly KM; Graves KD; Harper FW; Schmidt JE; Dickinson SL; Andrykowski MA
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2007; 31(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 18061368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.