239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19648751)
1. Comparison of 0.05% chlorhexidine and 10% povidone-iodine as cutaneous disinfectant for prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a comparative study.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Kubota K
Eur Surg Res; 2009; 43(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 19648751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective randomized trial of 10% povidone-iodine versus 0.5% tincture of chlorhexidine as cutaneous antisepsis for prevention of central venous catheter infection.
Humar A; Ostromecki A; Direnfeld J; Marshall JC; Lazar N; Houston PC; Boiteau P; Conly JM
Clin Infect Dis; 2000 Oct; 31(4):1001-7. PubMed ID: 11049783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dressing change reduces the central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Kubota K
Hepatogastroenterology; 2011; 58(112):1882-6. PubMed ID: 22234057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of chlorhexidine gluconate for central venous catheter site care at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Balamongkhon B; Thamlikitkul V
Am J Infect Control; 2007 Nov; 35(9):585-8. PubMed ID: 17980236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alcoholic povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine-based antiseptic for the prevention of central venous catheter-related infections: in-use comparison.
Girard R; Comby C; Jacques D
J Infect Public Health; 2012 Mar; 5(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22341841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction in catheter-related infections after switching from povidone-iodine to chlorhexidine for the exit-site care of tunneled central venous catheters in children on hemodialysis.
Paglialonga F; Consolo S; Biasuzzi A; Assomou J; Gattarello E; Patricelli MG; Giannini A; Chidini G; Napolitano L; Edefonti A
Hemodial Int; 2014 Oct; 18 Suppl 1():S13-8. PubMed ID: 25330826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined skin disinfection with chlorhexidine/propanol and aqueous povidone-iodine reduces bacterial colonisation of central venous catheters.
Langgartner J; Linde HJ; Lehn N; Reng M; Schölmerich J; Glück T
Intensive Care Med; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1081-8. PubMed ID: 15085323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine gluconate compared with povidone-iodine solution for catheter-site care in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand.
Maenthaisong R; Chaiyakunapruk N; Thamlikitkul V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Nov; 89 Suppl 5():S94-101. PubMed ID: 17718250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of catheter-related infections in neutropenic patients: a prospective controlled randomized trial using a chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheter.
Jaeger K; Zenz S; Jüttner B; Ruschulte H; Kuse E; Heine J; Piepenbrock S; Ganser A; Karthaus M
Ann Hematol; 2005 Apr; 84(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 15549302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.
Mimoz O; Lucet JC; Kerforne T; Pascal J; Souweine B; Goudet V; Mercat A; Bouadma L; Lasocki S; Alfandari S; Friggeri A; Wallet F; Allou N; Ruckly S; Balayn D; Lepape A; Timsit JF;
Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10008):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 26388532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One percent chlorhexidine-alcohol for preventing central venous catheter-related infection during intensive chemotherapy for patients with haematologic malignancies.
Ohtake S; Takahashi H; Nakagawa M; Uchino Y; Miura K; Iriyama N; Nakayama T; Hatta Y; Takei M
J Infect Chemother; 2018 Jul; 24(7):544-548. PubMed ID: 29627326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translating evidence into practice to prevent central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: a systems-based intervention.
Young EM; Commiskey ML; Wilson SJ
Am J Infect Control; 2006 Oct; 34(8):503-6. PubMed ID: 17015155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cell transplantation.
Maaskant JM; De Boer JP; Dalesio O; Holtkamp MJ; Lucas C
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Sep; 18(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 19453696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solution vs alcohol-based povidone-iodine for central venous catheter care.
Mimoz O; Villeminey S; Ragot S; Dahyot-Fizelier C; Laksiri L; Petitpas F; Debaene B
Arch Intern Med; 2007 Oct; 167(19):2066-72. PubMed ID: 17954800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Central venous catheterization: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Mer M; Duse AG; Galpin JS; Richards GA
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2009 Feb; 15(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18593746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients.
Mimoz O; Pieroni L; Lawrence C; Edouard A; Costa Y; Samii K; Brun-Buisson C
Crit Care Med; 1996 Nov; 24(11):1818-23. PubMed ID: 8917031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis.
Chaiyakunapruk N; Veenstra DL; Lipsky BA; Saint S
Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jun; 136(11):792-801. PubMed ID: 12044127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.
Guenezan J; Marjanovic N; Drugeon B; Neill RO; Liuu E; Roblot F; Palazzo P; Bironneau V; Prevost F; Paul J; Pichon M; Boisson M; Frasca D; Mimoz O;
Lancet Infect Dis; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1038-1048. PubMed ID: 33539734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Prevention of catheter-related infection: usefulness and cost-effectiveness of antiseptic catheters in children].
Lenz AM; Vassallo JC; Moreno GE; Althabe M; Gómez S; Magliola R; Casimir L; Bologna R; Barretta J; Ruffa P
Arch Argent Pediatr; 2010 Jun; 108(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 20544135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vascular catheter site care: the clinical and economic benefits of chlorhexidine gluconate compared with povidone iodine.
Chaiyakunapruk N; Veenstra DL; Lipsky BA; Sullivan SD; Saint S
Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Sep; 37(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 12955636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
