These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19648916)

  • 1. Phymm and PhymmBL: metagenomic phylogenetic classification with interpolated Markov models.
    Brady A; Salzberg SL
    Nat Methods; 2009 Sep; 6(9):673-6. PubMed ID: 19648916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep learning models for bacteria taxonomic classification of metagenomic data.
    Fiannaca A; La Paglia L; La Rosa M; Lo Bosco G; Renda G; Rizzo R; Gaglio S; Urso A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 19(Suppl 7):198. PubMed ID: 30066629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the Quantitative Capabilities of Metagenomic Analysis Software.
    Kerepesi C; Grolmusz V
    Curr Microbiol; 2016 May; 72(5):612-6. PubMed ID: 26831696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid phylogenetic and functional classification of short genomic fragments with signature peptides.
    Berendzen J; Bruno WJ; Cohn JD; Hengartner NW; Kuske CR; McMahon BH; Wolinsky MA; Xie G
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Aug; 5():460. PubMed ID: 22925230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CSSSCL: a python package that uses combined sequence similarity scores for accurate taxonomic classification of long and short sequence reads.
    Borozan I; Ferretti V
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(3):453-5. PubMed ID: 26454281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clustering metagenomic sequences with interpolated Markov models.
    Kelley DR; Salzberg SL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 11():544. PubMed ID: 21044341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classifying short genomic fragments from novel lineages using composition and homology.
    Parks DH; MacDonald NJ; Beiko RG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 12():328. PubMed ID: 21827705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RAIphy: phylogenetic classification of metagenomics samples using iterative refinement of relative abundance index profiles.
    Nalbantoglu OU; Way SF; Hinrichs SH; Sayood K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():41. PubMed ID: 21281493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
    Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
    Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ORFome assembly approach to metagenomics sequences analysis.
    Ye Y; Tang H
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2008; 7():3-13. PubMed ID: 19642264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MBMC: An Effective Markov Chain Approach for Binning Metagenomic Reads from Environmental Shotgun Sequencing Projects.
    Wang Y; Hu H; Li X
    OMICS; 2016 Aug; 20(8):470-9. PubMed ID: 27447888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MetaDomain: a profile HMM-based protein domain classification tool for short sequences.
    Zhang Y; Sun Y
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2012; ():271-82. PubMed ID: 22174282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MetaBinG: using GPUs to accelerate metagenomic sequence classification.
    Jia P; Xuan L; Liu L; Wei C
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e25353. PubMed ID: 22132069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metagenomic taxonomic classification using extreme learning machines.
    Rasheed Z; Rangwala H
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2012 Oct; 10(5):1250015. PubMed ID: 22849369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Higher-order Markov models for metagenomic sequence classification.
    Burks DJ; Azad RK
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 36(14):4130-4136. PubMed ID: 32516355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving de novo sequence assembly using machine learning and comparative genomics for overlap correction.
    Palmer LE; Dejori M; Bolanos R; Fasulo D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():33. PubMed ID: 20078885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accurate phylogenetic classification of variable-length DNA fragments.
    McHardy AC; Martín HG; Tsirigos A; Hugenholtz P; Rigoutsos I
    Nat Methods; 2007 Jan; 4(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 17179938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phylogenetic placement of metagenomic reads using the minimum evolution principle.
    Filipski A; Tamura K; Billing-Ross P; Murillo O; Kumar S
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. PubMed ID: 25923672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics.
    Mitra S; Schubach M; Huson DH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20122183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phylogenetic classification of short environmental DNA fragments.
    Krause L; Diaz NN; Goesmann A; Kelley S; Nattkemper TW; Rohwer F; Edwards RA; Stoye J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Apr; 36(7):2230-9. PubMed ID: 18285365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.