These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19649481)
61. The Influence of Efferent Inhibition on Speech Perception in Noise: A Revisit Through Its Level-Dependent Function. Yashaswini L; Maruthy S Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):508-515. PubMed ID: 31461336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Efferent-induced alterations in distortion and reflection otoacoustic emissions in children. Mishra SK; Biswal M; Amatya A J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):640. PubMed ID: 29495742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice. Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: intra-individual variability in tinnitus and normal subjects. Graham RL; Hazell JW Br J Audiol; 1994; 28(4-5):235-45. PubMed ID: 7735152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission. Xing D; Gong Q Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Isoflurane increases amplitude and incidence of evoked and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Drexl M; Henke J; Kössl M Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):135-42. PubMed ID: 15276684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. A nicotinic-like receptor mediates suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by contralateral sound. Kujawa SG; Glattke TJ; Fallon M; Bobbin RP Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 74(1-2):122-34. PubMed ID: 8040083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise. Kumar UA; Vanaja CS Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 15064659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children. Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The medial olivocochlear reflex in children during active listening. Smith SB; Cone B Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug; 54(8):518-23. PubMed ID: 25735203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Paradoxical effects of contralateral white noise on evoked otoacoustic emissions in ears with acoustic neuroma. Quaranta A; Gandolfi A; Fava G; Quaranta N; Zini C Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 11603779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Evaluation of the efferent auditory system in COVID-19 adult patients. Emekci T; Dündar MA; Kirazlı G; Men Kılınç F; Cengiz DU; Karababa E; İnceoğlu F; Arbağ H Acta Otolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 142(6):509-514. PubMed ID: 35791801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [The application of otoacoustic emissions measurement in the assessment of the function of cochlear efferent fibers: the study of normal hearing subjects]. Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10337165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Wavelet analysis demonstrates no abnormality in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in tinnitus patients. Geven LI; Wit HP; de Kleine E; van Dijk P Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 286(1-2):30-40. PubMed ID: 22387429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]