106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19650172)
1. Radiographic size versus surgical size of renal masses: which is the true size of the tumor?
Alicioglu B; Kaplan M; Yurut-Caloglu V; Usta U; Levent S
J BUON; 2009; 14(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 19650172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic versus pathologic size of renal tumors: implications for partial nephrectomy.
Herr HW; Lee CT; Sharma S; Hilton S
Urology; 2001 Aug; 58(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 11489688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Discrepancy between radiological and pathological sizes of renal masses].
Huang JW; Dong BJ; Zhang J; Kong W; Xue W; Liu DM; Huang YR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 35(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 24119902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of radiographic and pathologic sizes of renal tumors.
Chen W; Wang L; Yang Q; Liu B; Sun Y
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 23683665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of radiographic and pathologic sizes of renal tumors.
Lee SE; Lee WK; Kim DS; Doo SH; Park HZ; Yoon CY; Hwang SI; Lee HJ; Choe G; Hong SK
World J Urol; 2010 Jun; 28(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 20119641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic vs surgical size of renal tumours after partial nephrectomy.
Herr HW
BJU Int; 2000 Jan; 85(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 10619938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy using radiofrequency ablation.
Uchida A; Miyajima A; Horiguchi A; Ide H; Hatakeyama N; Yoshimura I
Int J Urol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 16448436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The radiographic evolution of radio frequency ablated renal tumors.
Matsumoto ED; Watumull L; Johnson DB; Ogan K; Taylor GD; Josephs S; Cadeddu JA
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15201734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How does the radiographic size of a renal mass compare with the pathologic size?
Schlomer B; Figenshau RS; Yan Y; Bhayani SB
Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 16904439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hilar location is an independent prognostic factor for recurrence in T1 renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy.
Shim M; Song C; Park S; Kim A; Choi SK; Kim CS; Ahn H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):344-50. PubMed ID: 25323469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with CT.
Zhang J; Lefkowitz RA; Ishill NM; Wang L; Moskowitz CS; Russo P; Eisenberg H; Hricak H
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):494-504. PubMed ID: 17641370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy.
Lane BR; Babineau D; Kattan MW; Novick AC; Gill IS; Zhou M; Weight CJ; Campbell SC
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 17561141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathological stage does not alter the prognosis for renal lesions determined to be stage T1 by computerized tomography.
Roberts WW; Bhayani SB; Allaf ME; Chan TY; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):713-5. PubMed ID: 15711249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is adrenalectomy a necessary component of radical nephrectomy? UCLA experience with 511 radical nephrectomies.
Tsui KH; Shvarts O; Barbaric Z; Figlin R; de Kernion JB; Belldegrun A
J Urol; 2000 Feb; 163(2):437-41. PubMed ID: 10647649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Renal tumor size: comparison between computed tomography and surgical measurements.
Irani J; Humbert M; Lecocq B; Pires C; Lefèbvre O; Doré B
Eur Urol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 11275723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of presentation and outcome for patients 18 to 40 and 60 to 70 years old with solid renal masses.
Gillett MD; Cheville JC; Karnes RJ; Lohse CM; Kwon ED; Leibovich BC; Zincke H; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1893-6. PubMed ID: 15879770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Small renal cell carcinomas: correlation of size with tumor stage, nuclear grade, and histologic subtype.
Hsu RM; Chan DY; Siegelman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 14975944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Can primary kidney clear cell adenocarcinoma be differentiated from kidney metastasis with computed tomography?].
Le Normand S; Soyer P; Klein I; Hervé JM; Scherrer A
Prog Urol; 1997 Jun; 7(3):403-7. PubMed ID: 9273067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of discordant radiologic and pathologic tumor size on renal cancer staging.
Kanofsky JA; Phillips CK; Stifelman MD; Taneja SS
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):728-31. PubMed ID: 17070342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic radical versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1bN0M0 renal tumors: comparison of perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes.
Deklaj T; Lifshitz DA; Shikanov SA; Katz MH; Zorn KC; Shalhav AL
J Endourol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1603-7. PubMed ID: 20932215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
