These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19650521)

  • 1. A test of the null hypothesis significance testing procedure correlation argument.
    Trafimow D; Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 19650521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.
    Masson ME
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 21302025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Omnibus hypothesis testing in dominance-based ordinal multiple regression.
    Long JD
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):329-51. PubMed ID: 16221032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-significance testing in between-subject experimental designs.
    Balluerka Lasa N; Vergara Iraeta AI; Arnau Gras J
    Psicothema; 2009 Feb; 21(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 19178869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hail the impossible: p-values, evidence, and likelihood.
    Johansson T
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Apr; 52(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 21077903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of research data: hypothesis testing.
    Stolar MH
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Nov; 37(11):1539-45. PubMed ID: 7211860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing.
    Guyatt G; Jaeschke R; Heddle N; Cook D; Shannon H; Walter S
    CMAJ; 1995 Jan; 152(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7804919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
    Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How often is prep close to the true replication probability?
    Trafimow D; MacDonald JA; Rice S; Clason DL
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 20822254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Not significant--what now?].
    Gerss J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Dec; 128(6):307-10. PubMed ID: 17213967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of p rep.
    Iverson GJ; Wagenmakers EJ; Lee MD
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 20515238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [How to assess the size of a clinical trial?].
    Paesmans M
    Rev Mal Respir; 1994; 11(6):547-57. PubMed ID: 7831504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian hypothesis testing-use in interpretation of measurements.
    Miller G; Martz H; Little T; Bertelli L
    Health Phys; 2008 Mar; 94(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 18301098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between baseline value and its change: problems in categorization and the proposal of a new method.
    Tu YK; Baelum V; Gilthorpe MS
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Aug; 113(4):279-88. PubMed ID: 16048519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Review of statistical procedures for determining the equivalency of two treatments].
    Com-Nougue C; Rodary C
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1987; 35(5):416-30. PubMed ID: 3324228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
    Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
    Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Redressing the power and effect of significance. A new approach to an old problem: teaching statistics to nursing students.
    Taylor S; Muncer S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2000 Jul; 20(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 10895117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.