These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19650524)

  • 1. Examining single- and multiple-process theories of trust in automation.
    Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 19650524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of response bias and judgment framing on operator use of an automated aid in a target detection task.
    Rice S; McCarley JS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):320-31. PubMed ID: 21707202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trust and the Compliance-Reliance Paradigm: The Effects of Risk, Error Bias, and Reliability on Trust and Dependence.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Yamani Y; Handley HAH
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):333-345. PubMed ID: 28430544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA; Lacson FC
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 16884046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: a reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload.
    Dixon SR; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):474-86. PubMed ID: 17063963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the independence of compliance and reliance: are automation false alarms worse than misses?
    Dixon SR; Wickens CD; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 17702209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults.
    Pak R; Fink N; Price M; Bass B; Sturre L
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1059-72. PubMed ID: 22799560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system.
    Wang L; Jamieson GA; Hollands JG
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 19750792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Role of Trust as a Mediator Between System Characteristics and Response Behaviors.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Proaps AB; Madhavan P
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):947-58. PubMed ID: 25917611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using system-wide trust theory to make predictions about dependence on four diagnostic aids.
    Rice S; Geels K
    J Gen Psychol; 2010; 137(4):362-75. PubMed ID: 21086858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting automation failures in a simulated supervisory control environment.
    Foroughi CK; Sibley C; Brown NL; Rovira E; Pak R; Coyne JT
    Ergonomics; 2019 Sep; 62(9):1150-1161. PubMed ID: 31179874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():333-42. PubMed ID: 26360226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influencing Trust for Human-Automation Collaborative Scheduling of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles.
    Clare AS; Cummings ML; Repenning NP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1208-18. PubMed ID: 26060238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker.
    McFadden SM; Vimalachandran A; Blackmore E
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 14668161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. System-wide versus component-specific trust using multiple aids.
    Keller D; Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2010; 137(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 20198819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience of automation failures in training: effects on trust, automation bias, complacency and performance.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):767-80. PubMed ID: 26374396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age and automation interact to influence performance of a simulated luggage screening task.
    Wiegmann D; McCarley JS; Kramer AF; Wickens CD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Aug; 77(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 16909876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Humans: still vital after all these years of automation.
    Parasuraman R; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2008 Jun; 50(3):511-20. PubMed ID: 18689061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.