These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19650524)

  • 21. Bimodal response sensitivity and bias in a test of sustained attention contrasting patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder to normal comparison group.
    Baerwald JP; Tryon WW; Sandford J
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Jan; 20(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 15620812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lorazepam induces multiple disturbances in selective attention: attentional overload, decrement in target processing efficiency, and shifts in perceptual discrimination and response bias.
    Michael GA; Bacon E; Offerlin-Meyer I
    J Psychopharmacol; 2007 Sep; 21(7):691-9. PubMed ID: 17259205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transitioning to future air traffic management: effects of imperfect automation on controller attention and performance.
    Rovira E; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 21077563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of conflict alerting system reliability and task difficulty on pilots' conflict detection with cockpit display of traffic information.
    Xu X; Wickens CD; Rantanen EM
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 17178655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.
    Muir BM; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 8849495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Target Detection and Identification Performance Using an Automatic Target Detection System.
    Reiner AJ; Hollands JG; Jamieson GA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Mar; 59(2):242-258. PubMed ID: 27738280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of automation and task load on task switching during human supervision of multiple semi-autonomous robots in a dynamic environment.
    Squire PN; Parasuraman R
    Ergonomics; 2010 Aug; 53(8):951-61. PubMed ID: 20658389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of aging and attention-demanding tasks on false recognition induced by photographs: differences between conceptually and perceptually modified lures.
    Rémy P; Taconnat L; Isingrini M
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 18568980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation.
    Pop VL; Shrewsbury A; Durso FT
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 25977317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of system aesthetics on trust, cooperation, satisfaction and annoyance in an imperfect automated system.
    Weinstock A; Oron-Gilad T; Parmet Y
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():258-65. PubMed ID: 22316732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of sonification display pulse rate and reliability on operator trust and perceived workload during a simulated patient monitoring task.
    Spain RD; Bliss JP
    Ergonomics; 2008 Sep; 51(9):1320-37. PubMed ID: 18802818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vigilance and Automation Dependence in Operation of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS): A Simulation Study.
    Wohleber RW; Matthews G; Lin J; Szalma JL; Calhoun GL; Funke GJ; Chiu CP; Ruff HA
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):488-505. PubMed ID: 30265579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Human performance in a multiple-task environment: effects of automation reliability on visual attention allocation.
    Cullen RH; Rogers WA; Fisk AD
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):962-8. PubMed ID: 23660082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; Goodyear K; Lu L; O'Hara M; Lee MR; Parasuraman R; Krueger F
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):116-133. PubMed ID: 28146673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS; Kern RP; Walker DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 19589699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Go-no-go performance in pathological gamblers.
    Kertzman S; Lowengrub K; Aizer A; Vainder M; Kotler M; Dannon PN
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Oct; 161(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18789539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.