BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19651353)

  • 1. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement.
    Baumgaertel S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 19651353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.
    Ozdemir F; Tozlu M; Germec-Cakan D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23374925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults.
    Baumgaertel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 22133945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
    Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.
    Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants.
    Choi JH; Park CH; Yi SW; Lim HJ; Hwang HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):766.e1-12; discussion 766-7. PubMed ID: 19962594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Lim JE; Lee SJ; Kim YJ; Lim WH; Chun YS
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov; 12(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19840282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement.
    Sawada K; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Ide Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible.
    Park HS; Lee YJ; Jeong SH; Kwon TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18174068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of cortical bone thickness in adults by cone-beam computerized tomography for orthodontic miniscrews placement.
    Zhao H; Gu XM; Liu HC; Wang ZW; Xun CL
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2013 Apr; 33(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 23592148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Ono A; Motoyoshi M; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 37(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 18295454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients.
    Elshebiny T; Palomo JM; Baumgaertel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):505-511. PubMed ID: 29602342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
    Park J; Cho HJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positional guidelines for orthodontic mini-implant placement in the anterior alveolar region: a systematic review.
    Alsamak S; Psomiadis S; Gkantidis N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):470-9. PubMed ID: 23527349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants.
    Deguchi T; Nasu M; Murakami K; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):721.e7-12. PubMed ID: 16769488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Placement angle effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants and other factors with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Jung YR; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Lee EH; Chang NY; Chae JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 23374923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.