These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19651458)
1. Uncertainty inclusion in budgeting technology adoption at a hospital level: evidence from a multiple case study. Lettieri E Health Policy; 2009 Dec; 93(2-3):128-36. PubMed ID: 19651458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Priority setting for technology adoption at a hospital level: relevant issues from the literature. Lettieri E; Masella C Health Policy; 2009 Apr; 90(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 18783844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Budgeting and health technology assessment: first evidence obtained from proposal forms used to submit the adoption of new technology. Lettieri E; Masella C; Nocco U Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 18828947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers. Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. McGregor M; Brophy JM Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 15921068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Attitudes to the use of a decision support method when introducing new medical technology at the University Hospital of Copenhagen]. Folkersen J; Pedersen PH Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(21):2069-74. PubMed ID: 16768926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaching hospital administration about adopting cooling technologies. Kirkland LL; Parham WM; Pastores SM Crit Care Med; 2009 Jul; 37(7 Suppl):S290-4. PubMed ID: 19535961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integration of health technology assessment recommendations into organizational and clinical practice: A case study in Catalonia. Gagnon MP; Sánchez E; Pons JM Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 16571192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrating technology assessment into the capital budgeting process. Watts D; Finney DL; Louie B Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Feb; 47(2):20-4, 26, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10145749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marketing budgeting in nonprofit hospitals. Parry M; Parry AE; Farris PW J Health Care Mark; 1991 Jun; 11(2):2-13. PubMed ID: 10111398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding technology adoption in clinical care: clinician adoption behavior of a point-of-care reminder system. Zheng K; Padman R; Johnson MP; Diamond HS Int J Med Inform; 2005 Aug; 74(7-8):535-43. PubMed ID: 16043083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis in relation to budgetary constraints and reallocative restrictions. Adang E; Voordijk L; Jan van der Wilt G; Ament A Health Policy; 2005 Oct; 74(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 16153475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards multidisciplinary assessment of older people: exploring the change process. Ross F; O'Tuathail C; Stubberfield D J Clin Nurs; 2005 Apr; 14(4):518-29. PubMed ID: 15807760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion of medical technology: the role of financing. Cappellaro G; Ghislandi S; Anessi-Pessina E Health Policy; 2011 Apr; 100(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 21055840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The timing of medical technology acquisition: strategic decision making in turbulent environments. Friedman LH; Goes JB J Healthc Manag; 2000; 45(5):317-30; discussion 330-1. PubMed ID: 11067424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health care technology assessment and adoption: a case study. Veluchamy S; Alder HC Hosp Technol Ser; 1989 May; 8(13):1-12. PubMed ID: 10304477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adoption and implementation of strategies for diabetes management in primary care practices. Weiner BJ; Helfrich CD; Savitz LA; Swiger KD Am J Prev Med; 2007 Jul; 33(1 Suppl):S35-44; quiz S45-9. PubMed ID: 17584590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technology decision making. A constructive approach to planning and acquisition will require a paradigm shift. Berkowitz DA; Swan MM Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 10123568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facilitators and barriers to 10 National Quality Forum safe practices. Blake SC; Kohler S; Rask K; Davis A; Naylor DV Am J Med Qual; 2006; 21(5):323-34. PubMed ID: 16973949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of patient level data: a review of the use of Bayesian methods to inform health technology assessments. McCarron CE; Pullenayegum EM; Marshall DA; Goeree R; Tarride JE Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 19845985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]