260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19651827)
1. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome.
Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; Kwon YM; Gundle R; McLardy-Smith P; Beard DJ; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Aug; 91(8):1019-24. PubMed ID: 19651827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing.
Glyn-Jones S; Pandit H; Kwon YM; Doll H; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Dec; 91(12):1566-74. PubMed ID: 19949118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High incidence of pseudotumour formation after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study.
Bosker BH; Ettema HB; Boomsma MF; Kollen BJ; Maas M; Verheyen CC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):755-61. PubMed ID: 22628588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.
Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant failure in bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties: a clinical and pathological study.
Uchihara Y; Grammatopoulos G; Munemoto M; Matharu G; Inagaki Y; Pandit H; Tanaka Y; Athanasou NA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Mar; 29(3):28. PubMed ID: 29516273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Asymptomatic pseudotumours after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing show little change within one year.
van der Weegen W; Brakel K; Horn RJ; Hoekstra HJ; Sijbesma T; Pilot P; Nelissen RG
Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1626-31. PubMed ID: 24293591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Canadian Arthroplasty Society's experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips.
Canadian Arthroplasty Society
Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1045-51. PubMed ID: 23908418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the natural history of asymptomatic pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients?
Matharu GS; Ostlere SJ; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Hip Int; 2016 Nov; 26(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 27791239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure.
Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Jaiswal A; Richardson JB
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1344-50. PubMed ID: 20884969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between head-neck ratio and pseudotumour formation in metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; ; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Nov; 92(11):1527-34. PubMed ID: 21037347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision of a single type of large metal head metal-on-metal hip prosthesis.
van Lingen CP; Ettema HB; Bosker BH; Verheyen CC
Hip Int; 2015; 25(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 25907389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Similar incidence of periprosthetic fluid collections after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties and metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties: results of a screening metal artefact reduction sequence-MRI study.
Bisseling P; de Wit BW; Hol AM; van Gorp MJ; van Kampen A; van Susante JL
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1175-82. PubMed ID: 26330582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours.
Kwon YM; Glyn-Jones S; Simpson DJ; Kamali A; McLardy-Smith P; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):356-61. PubMed ID: 20190305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients.
Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC; Dorey FJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Dec; 89(12):2705-11. PubMed ID: 18056503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis.
Ollivere B; Darrah C; Barker T; Nolan J; Porteous MJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Aug; 91(8):1025-30. PubMed ID: 19651828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.
Pandit H; Glyn-Jones S; McLardy-Smith P; Gundle R; Whitwell D; Gibbons CL; Ostlere S; Athanasou N; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jul; 90(7):847-51. PubMed ID: 18591590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
