260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19651827)
21. Adverse reaction to metal debris in a consecutive series of DUROM™ hip resurfacing: pseudotumour incidence and metal ion concentration.
Hartmann A; Kieback JD; Lützner J; Günther KP; Goronzy J
Hip Int; 2017 Jul; 27(4):343-348. PubMed ID: 28218371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Trochanteric non-union following revision hip replacement is associated with a poor functional outcome: a matched, case-control study.
Amin AK; Bergman N
Hip Int; 2013; 23(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 23934898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?
Newman MA; Barker KL; Pandit H; Murray DW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 18373996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1424-1433. PubMed ID: 30418058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Functional results of isolated femoral revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Gilbert RE; Cheung G; Carrothers AD; Meyer C; Richardson JB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jul; 92(7):1600-4. PubMed ID: 20595565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The ten-year survival of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent series.
Murray DW; Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; Gundle R; Gill HS; McLardy-Smith P
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Sep; 94(9):1180-6. PubMed ID: 22933488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pseudotumour incidence, cobalt levels and clinical outcome after large head metal-on-metal and conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: mid-term results of a randomised controlled trial.
van der Veen HC; Reininga IH; Zijlstra WP; Boomsma MF; Bulstra SK; van Raay JJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1481-7. PubMed ID: 26530649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bearing exchange in the management of pseudotumours.
Kemp MA; Mitra A; da Costa TM; Spencer RF
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2013 May; 95(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 23676811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term survivorship of the Corail™ standard stem.
Louboutin L; Viste A; Desmarchelier R; Fessy MH
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 103(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 28778624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing in Patients 45 Years of Age and Younger at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.
Dowding C; Dobransky JS; Kim PR; Beaulé PE
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Oct; 33(10):3196-3200. PubMed ID: 29914818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Howard PW; Blom AW;
Lancet; 2012 Nov; 380(9855):1759-66. PubMed ID: 23036895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
Miettinen SSA; Mäkinen TJ; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen JS; Remes V
Scand J Surg; 2018 Jun; 107(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29333941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Rahman WA; Amenábar T; Hetaimish BM; Safir OA; Kuzyk PR; Gross AE
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2559-2563. PubMed ID: 27378637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing.
Eswaramoorthy VK; Biant LC; Field RE
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Nov; 91(11):1454-8. PubMed ID: 19880889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survival and revision causes of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and the Mitch proximal epiphyseal replacement: results from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Tang-Jensen M; Kjærsgaard-Andersen P; Poulsen TK; Overgaard S; Varnum C
Acta Orthop; 2019 Dec; 90(6):523-529. PubMed ID: 31340710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision.
Prosser GH; Yates PJ; Wood DJ; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Miller LN
Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 20180719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of the effect of large and small metal-on-metal bearings in total hip arthroplasty on metal ion levels and the incidence of pseudotumour: a five-year follow-up of a previous report.
Ando W; Yasui H; Yamamoto K; Oinuma K; Tokunaga H; Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Aihara M; Nakanishi R; Ohzono K
Bone Joint J; 2018 Aug; 100-B(8):1018-1024. PubMed ID: 30062951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Which imaging modality is most effective for identifying pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacings requiring revision: ultrasound or MARS-MRI or both?
Matharu GS; Mansour R; Dada O; Ostlere S; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Bone Joint J; 2016 Jan; 98-B(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 26733514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
