367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19651944)
1. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses a prospective randomized study.
Kim YH; Choi Y; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Aug; 91(8):1874-81. PubMed ID: 19651944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study.
Kim YH; Choi Y; Kwon OR; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Apr; 91(4):753-60. PubMed ID: 19339558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study.
Kim YH; Sohn KS; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 87(7):1470-5. PubMed ID: 15995113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of high-flexion and standard cruciate-retaining designs.
Seon JK; Park SJ; Lee KB; Yoon TR; Kozanek M; Song EK
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91(3):672-9. PubMed ID: 19255229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial.
Chaudhary R; Beaupré LA; Johnston DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 90(12):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19047702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study.
Kim YH; Choi Y; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(10):1911-20. PubMed ID: 20720134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: survivorship and prevalence of osteolysis: results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(15):1378-84. PubMed ID: 22854990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study.
Choi WC; Lee S; Seong SC; Jung JH; Lee MC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2634-42. PubMed ID: 20952606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-flexion posterior-substituting versus cruciate-retaining prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: functional outcome, range of motion and complication comparison.
Zhang Z; Zhu W; Zhang W
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 25388862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Hofstede SN; Nouta KA; Jacobs W; van Hooff ML; Wymenga AB; Pijls BG; Nelissen RG; Marang-van de Mheen PJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb; 2015(2):CD003130. PubMed ID: 25650566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses.
Ishii Y; Noguchi H; Sato J; Sakurai T; Toyabe SI
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3536-3542. PubMed ID: 27485124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and High-Flexion Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Design.
Lee WG; Song EK; Choi SW; Jin QH; Seon JK
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Mar; 35(3):752-755. PubMed ID: 31676176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior cruciate-retaining, rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty: minimum 4-year follow-up study.
Elwood JJ; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD
Orthopedics; 2012 Dec; 35(12):e1699-704. PubMed ID: 23218624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do High-Flexion Total Knee Designs Increase the Risk of Femoral Component Loosening?
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1862-1868. PubMed ID: 28238582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.
Vogt JC; Saarbach C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior cruciate-substituting total knee replacement recovers the flexion arc faster in the early postoperative period in knees with high varus deformity: a prospective randomized study.
Öztürk A; Akalın Y; Çevik N; Otuzbir A; Özkan Y; Dostabakan Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Jul; 136(7):999-1006. PubMed ID: 27271754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of standard and gender-specific posterior-cruciate-retaining high-flexion total knee replacements: a prospective, randomised study.
Kim YH; Choi Y; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 May; 92(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 20435999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the low contact stress and press fit condylar rotating-platform mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Park JW; Joo JH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jun; 93(11):1001-7. PubMed ID: 21655893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome and range of motion using a high-flexion cruciate-retaining TKA.
Rosen AS; Neville L; Pulido PA; Patil S; Walker RH; Copp SN
Orthopedics; 2013 Sep; 36(9):e1198-202. PubMed ID: 24025013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity.
Ünkar EA; Öztürkmen Y; Şükür E; Çarkçı E; Mert M
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):95-99. PubMed ID: 28108167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
