177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19652980)
1. [Frequency-doubling technology : A new method for determining glaucomatous visual field defects].
Lamparter J; Schulze A; Hoffmann EM
Ophthalmologe; 2009 Aug; 106(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 19652980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
Bayer AU; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of 10-2 Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry for Detecting Central Visual Field Defects in Preperimetric Glaucoma Patients.
Jung Y; Park HL; Park YR; Park CK
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):14622. PubMed ID: 29116211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage.
Soliman MA; de Jong LA; Ismaeil AA; van den Berg TJ; de Smet MD
Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage as assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with a visual field defect detected by frequency doubling technology perimetry but not by standard automated perimetry.
Kim TW; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sample PA; Shah N; Weinreb RN
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1053-7. PubMed ID: 17239441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma.
Kim SA; Park CK; Park HL
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10173. PubMed ID: 35715424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma.
Horn FK; Scharch V; Mardin CY; Lämmer R; Kremers J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):937-46. PubMed ID: 26883356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Kamantigue ME; Joson PJ; Chen PP
J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 16378016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
Hu R; Wang C; Racette L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined use of frequency doubling perimetry and polarimetric measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma detection.
Horn FK; Nguyen NX; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 12566019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The distribution of visual field defects per quadrant in standard automated perimetry as compared to frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Zein WM; Bashshur ZF; Jaafar RF; Noureddin BN
Int Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 30(6):683-9. PubMed ID: 20924646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of frequency doubling technology perimetry 24-2 in glaucoma with parafoveal scotoma.
Jung KI; Kim EK; Park CK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jun; 96(24):e6855. PubMed ID: 28614218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma.
Spry PG; Johnson CA; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA
J Glaucoma; 2005 Feb; 14(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 15650598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
