BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19653091)

  • 1. Steady state visually evoked potential correlates of static and dynamic emotional face processing.
    Mayes AK; Pipingas A; Silberstein RB; Johnston P
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Nov; 22(3):145-57. PubMed ID: 19653091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emotions in motion: dynamic compared to static facial expressions of disgust and happiness reveal more widespread emotion-specific activations.
    Trautmann SA; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1284():100-15. PubMed ID: 19501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender differences in the cortical electrophysiological processing of visual emotional stimuli.
    Kemp AH; Silberstein RB; Armstrong SM; Nathan PJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):632-46. PubMed ID: 14980566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging.
    Vuilleumier P; Pourtois G
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(1):174-94. PubMed ID: 16854439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EEG phase synchrony differences across visual perception conditions may depend on recording and analysis methods.
    Trujillo LT; Peterson MA; Kaszniak AW; Allen JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):172-89. PubMed ID: 15589196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurophysiological correlates for the perception of facial sexual dimorphism.
    Cellerino A; Borghetti D; Valenzano DR; Tartarelli G; Mennucci A; Murri L; Sartucci F
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Mar; 71(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 17259021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional MRI of facial emotion recognition deficits in schizophrenia and their electrophysiological correlates.
    Johnston PJ; Stojanov W; Devir H; Schall U
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 22(5):1221-32. PubMed ID: 16176365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual processing in a facial emotional context: an ERP study.
    González-Garrido AA; Ramos-Loyo J; López-Franco AL; Gómez-Velázquez FR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jan; 71(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18771695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inverse mapping the neuronal substrates of face categorizations.
    Smith ML; Fries P; Gosselin F; Goebel R; Schyns PG
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Oct; 19(10):2428-38. PubMed ID: 19168662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explicit and incidental facial expression processing: an fMRI study.
    Gorno-Tempini ML; Pradelli S; Serafini M; Pagnoni G; Baraldi P; Porro C; Nicoletti R; Umità C; Nichelli P
    Neuroimage; 2001 Aug; 14(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 11467919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological correlates of perceiving and evaluating static and dynamic facial emotional expressions.
    Recio G; Sommer W; Schacht A
    Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 1376():66-75. PubMed ID: 21172314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early and late temporo-spatial effects of contextual interference during perception of facial affect.
    Frühholz S; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19470392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The categorization of natural scenes: brain attention networks revealed by dense sensor ERPs.
    Codispoti M; Ferrari V; Junghöfer M; Schupp HT
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):583-91. PubMed ID: 16750397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face perception is mediated by a distributed cortical network.
    Ishai A; Schmidt CF; Boesiger P
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 Sep; 67(1-2):87-93. PubMed ID: 16140166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The persistence of attention to emotion: brain potentials during and after picture presentation.
    Hajcak G; Olvet DM
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 18410198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing.
    Maurer D; O'Craven KM; Le Grand R; Mondloch CJ; Springer MV; Lewis TL; Grady CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1438-51. PubMed ID: 17204295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender related differences in visual and auditory processing of verbal and figural tasks.
    Jausovec N; Jausovec K
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1300():135-45. PubMed ID: 19747461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The evoked cortical activity of the cerebral hemispheres in man during the active and passive perception of facial expression].
    Mikhaĭlova ES; Bogomolova IV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1999; 49(4):566-75. PubMed ID: 10512018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early selection of diagnostic facial information in the human visual cortex.
    Joyce CA; Schyns PG; Gosselin F; Cottrell GW; Rossion B
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):800-13. PubMed ID: 16266735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of spatial frequency information for ERP components sensitive to faces and emotional facial expression.
    Holmes A; Winston JS; Eimer M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):508-20. PubMed ID: 16168629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 66.