209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19653499)
1. Laboratory and field evaluation of SS220 and deet against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia.
Frances SP; Mackenzie DO; Klun JA; Debboun M
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Jun; 25(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 19653499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and IR3535 against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia.
Frances SP; MacKenzie DO; Rowcliffe KL; Corcoran SK
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Dec; 25(4):511-3. PubMed ID: 20099600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Field evaluation of commercial repellent formulations against mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Northern Territory, Australia.
Frances SP; Waterson DG; Beebe NW; Cooper RD
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2005 Dec; 21(4):480-2. PubMed ID: 16506580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia.
Frances SP; Cooper RD; Sweeney AW
J Med Entomol; 1998 Sep; 35(5):690-3. PubMed ID: 9775594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative laboratory and field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and lemon eucalyptus oil against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia.
Frances SP; Rigby LM; Chow WK
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2014 Mar; 30(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 24772681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repellent and deterrent effects of SS220, Picaridin, and Deet suppress human blood feeding by Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Phlebotomus papatasi.
Klun JA; Khrimian A; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2006 Jan; 43(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16506445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Field evaluation of repellent formulations against daytime and nighttime biting mosquitoes in a tropical rainforest in northern Australia.
Frances SP; Van Dung N; Beebe NW; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2002 May; 39(3):541-4. PubMed ID: 12061453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory and field evaluations of the insect repellent 3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate) and deet against mosquito vectors in Thailand.
Thavara U; Tawatsin A; Chompoosri J; Suwonkerd W; Chansang UR; Asavadachanukorn P
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2001 Sep; 17(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 14529087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Field evaluation and user acceptability of repellent formulations containing DEET against mosquitoes in Australia.
Frances SP
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2013 Sep; 29(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 24199505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and picaridin against mosquitoes in Northern Territory, Australia.
Frances SP; Waterson DG; Beebe NW; Cooper RD
J Med Entomol; 2004 May; 41(3):414-7. PubMed ID: 15185943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are commercially available essential oils from Australian native plants repellent to mosquitoes?
Maguranyi SK; Webb CE; Mansfield S; Russell RC
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Sep; 25(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 19852219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Synthesis and repellent efficacy of a new chiral piperidine analog: comparison with Deet and Bayrepel activity in human-volunteer laboratory assays against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi.
Klun JA; Khrimian A; Margaryan A; Kramer M; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2003 May; 40(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 12943107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory and field evaluation of deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand.
Frances SP; Klein TA; Hildebrandt DW; Burge R; Noigamol C; Eikarat N; Sripongsai B; Wirtz RA
J Med Entomol; 1996 Jul; 33(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 8699442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Field evaluation of arthropod repellents, deet and a piperidine compound, AI3-37220, against Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in western Kenya.
Walker TW; Robert LL; Copeland RA; Githeko AK; Wirtz RA; Githure JI; Klein TA
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1996 Jun; 12(2 Pt 1):172-6. PubMed ID: 8827589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Field evaluation of deet against Anopheles farauti at Ndendo (Santa Cruz) Island, Solomon Islands.
Frances SP; Bugoro H; Butafa C; Cooper RD
J Med Entomol; 2010 Sep; 47(5):851-4. PubMed ID: 20939380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA
Mbuba E; Odufuwa OG; Tenywa FC; Philipo R; Tambwe MM; Swai JK; Moore JD; Moore SJ
Malar J; 2021 Jan; 20(1):12. PubMed ID: 33407496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory evaluation of AI3-37220, AI3-35765, CIC-4, and deet repellents against three species of mosquitoes.
Debboun M; Strickman D; Klein TA; Glass JA; Wylie E; Laughinghouse A; Wirtz RA; Gupta RK
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1999 Sep; 15(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 10480126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks.
Carroll JF; Klun JA; Debboun M
Med Vet Entomol; 2005 Mar; 19(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 15752184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory and field evaluation of MAÏA
Traoré A; Niyondiko G; Sanou A; Langevin F; Sagnon N; Gansané A; Guelbeogo MW
Malar J; 2021 May; 20(1):226. PubMed ID: 34016099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Ixodes spp. - a literature review.
Lupi E; Hatz C; Schlagenhauf P
Travel Med Infect Dis; 2013; 11(6):374-411. PubMed ID: 24201040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
