BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19653548)

  • 1. Tips on overlapping confidence intervals and univariate linear models.
    Odueyungbo A; Thabane L; Markle-Reid M
    Nurse Res; 2009; 16(4):73-83. PubMed ID: 19653548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
    Corty EW; Corty RW
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of repeated-measures analysis of variance and hierarchical linear model in nursing research.
    Shin JH
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 19448525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Therapist effects in randomised controlled trials: what to do about them.
    Walters SJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2010 Apr; 19(7-8):1102-12. PubMed ID: 20492055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological issues associated with group intervention research.
    Murphy SA; Johnson LC
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2006 Dec; 20(6):276-81. PubMed ID: 17145455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytic methods for questions pertaining to a randomized pretest, posttest, follow-up design.
    Rausch JR; Maxwell SE; Kelley K
    J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol; 2003 Sep; 32(3):467-86. PubMed ID: 12881035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of covariate effects in generalized linear mixed models with a misspecified distribution of random intercepts and slopes.
    Neuhaus JM; McCulloch CE; Boylan R
    Stat Med; 2013 Jun; 32(14):2419-29. PubMed ID: 23203817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
    Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to deal with multiple treatment or dose groups in randomized clinical trials?
    Hothorn LA
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 17391286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accounting for dropout bias using mixed-effects models.
    Mallinckrodt CH; Clark WS; David SR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 11459446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The distribution of loss in two-treatment biased-coin designs.
    Atkinson AC
    Biostatistics; 2003 Apr; 4(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 12925515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
    Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should baseline be a covariate or dependent variable in analyses of change from baseline in clinical trials?
    Liu GF; Lu K; Mogg R; Mallick M; Mehrotra DV
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2509-30. PubMed ID: 19610129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the effectiveness of interventions: exploration of two statistical methods.
    Fox MT; Brathwaite AC; Sidani S
    Can J Nurs Res; 2004 Sep; 36(3):20-30. PubMed ID: 15551660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two new covariate adjustment methods for non-inferiority assessment of binary clinical trials data.
    Hou Y; Ding V; Li K; Zhou XH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 21191856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction to statistics. 2.
    Cluett E
    Mod Midwife; 1996 Oct; 6(10):12-5. PubMed ID: 9052139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an example from a randomized trial.
    Chaudhary MA; Stearns SC
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1447-58. PubMed ID: 8841654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression.
    Localio AR; Margolis DJ; Berlin JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):874-82. PubMed ID: 17689803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mixed models for data from thorough QT studies: part 1. assessment of marginal QT prolongation.
    Schall R; Ring A
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 21574242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferences on the mean response in a log-regression model: the generalized variable approach.
    Tian L; Wu J
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5180-8. PubMed ID: 17476648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.