202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19654081)
1. [Automated cell recognition in hematology: CellaVision DM96 TM system].
Surcouf C; Delaune D; Samson T; Foissaud V
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2009; 67(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 19654081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation and relevance of the CellaVision DM96 system in routine analysis and in patients with malignant hematological diseases.
Cornet E; Perol JP; Troussard X
Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Dec; 30(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 18983307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of an automated digital imaging system, Nextslide Digital Review Network, for examination of peripheral blood smears.
Yu H; Ok CY; Hesse A; Nordell P; Connor D; Sjostedt E; Pechet L; Snyder LM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jun; 136(6):660-7. PubMed ID: 22646275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Performance evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 system in WBC differentials].
Yamamoto T; Tabe Y; Ishii K; Itoh S; Maeno I; Matsumoto K; Horii T; Miida T; Ohsaka A
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Sep; 58(9):884-90. PubMed ID: 20963948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 system: WBC differentials by automated digital image analysis supported by an artificial neural network.
Kratz A; Bengtsson HI; Casey JE; Keefe JM; Beatrice GH; Grzybek DY; Lewandrowski KB; Van Cott EM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Nov; 124(5):770-81. PubMed ID: 16203273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of intracellular parasites by use of the CellaVision DM96 analyzer during routine screening of peripheral blood smears.
Racsa LD; Gander RM; Southern PM; McElvania TeKippe E; Doern C; Luu HS
J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Jan; 53(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 25378575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Morphology and immunophenotyping in hematological malignancies].
Kawai Y; Shimizu N; Ujiie M; Takeshita E; Todoroki T; Mitsuhashi T; Watanabe K
Rinsho Byori; 2000 Aug; 48(8):694-701. PubMed ID: 11064591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Circulating hematological malignant cells in peripheral blood, not detected by automated hematology analyzer].
Kawai Y; Shimizu N
Rinsho Byori; 2003 Jun; Suppl 126():34-42. PubMed ID: 12905939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A survey study of benefits and limitations of using CellaVision DM96 for peripheral blood differentials.
VanVranken SJ; Patterson ES; Rudmann SV; Waller KV
Clin Lab Sci; 2014; 27(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 24669444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The correlation between automated hematology and manually read smears for the determination of nucleated red blood cells in umbilical cord blood.
McCarthy JM; Capullari T; Spellacy WN
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Mar; 17(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 16147823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the detection of blasts by Sysmex hematology instruments, CellaVision DM96, and manual microscopy using flow cytometry as the confirmatory method.
Eilertsen H; Saether PC; Henriksson CE; Petersen AS; Hagve TA
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):338-344. PubMed ID: 30742354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The examination of peripheral blood and bone marrow in the diagnosis of malignant blood diseases].
García Marcos MA; Ríos A
Sangre (Barc); 1996 Aug; 41(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 8984668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system.
Briggs C; Longair I; Slavik M; Thwaite K; Mills R; Thavaraja V; Foster A; Romanin D; Machin SJ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2009 Feb; 31(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 18177438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated digital cell morphology identification system (CellaVision DM96) is very useful for leukocyte differentials in specimens with qualitative or quantitative abnormalities.
Park SH; Park CJ; Choi MO; Kim MJ; Cho YU; Jang S; Chi HS
Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Oct; 35(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 23286314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of fetomaternal hemorrhage: a comparative study of the manual and automated microscopic Kleihauer-Betke tests and flow cytometry in clinical samples.
Pelikan DM; Scherjon SA; Mesker WE; de Groot-Swings GM; Brouwer-Mandema GG; Tanke HJ; Kanhai HH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 191(2):551-7. PubMed ID: 15343236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Platelet Clumps on Peripheral Blood Smears by CellaVision DM96 System and Microscopic Review.
Gulati G; Uppal G; Florea AD; Gong J
Lab Med; 2014; 45(4):368-71. PubMed ID: 25316670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Morphologic analysis of blood cells].
Kikuchi T; Takeda Y; Shimizu A
Rinsho Byori; 1995 Sep; 43(9):917-24. PubMed ID: 7474455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Automation in hematology (author's transl)].
Binet JL
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1978 Jun; 20(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 360165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modern image analysis methods in hematology.
Ploem JS
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1988; 30(1-2):45-9. PubMed ID: 3290839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
